Lets get back to the subject of this thread. The Andy Shepard Signature Tenor.
I will reiterate my view. The 5K price tag aside, I'm still finding it very difficult to understand the point of this saxophone?
I read the small text on Sax.co.uk, and there it says that Andy tried three separate prototype horns before he was happy, over a period of 2 years. Much of the work had gone into the next angle, the bell design, and by the sounds of things, a lot of time into the keywork. They are all hand made. Real craftsmanship.
The idea, the concept, was to build the perfect saxophone. In fact, the perfect players saxophone, where sound and play-ability was on the top of the list. It does not have any fancy features, no engraving, not laquar. They then gave if to some big names in the industry, I even see that Morgan Fry has posted a note on this thread. He says that the tone was wonderful, and the keywork was light, fast and compact....
So, sounds great! And a lot of time money research and effort has gone into the perfect saxophone, the players horn!
So, this is the bit that puzzles me, why lock it away in some collectors cupboard, by limiting the number of horns to 100? All of them good ideas, lovely tone, light fast keywork, hidden from use by us, the players!?
It's a real shame. Trevor James has really gone up in the world of saxophones, gaining a lot of respect in the industry, and we hear they have the perfect design. This could really set the English Saxophone up there with the big boys!!
That's my point. Bad on you Mr Sheppard! Band on you Mr Farley! Don't lock it away! Let it free!!
Oh, and daveysaxboy. Please don't mention the price. Its not about the price. It about the pointlessness of this project. The loss of a potential legend in saxophones.