- Messages
- 598
- Location
- Zurich
some of them look like they've had marmite smeared on them!I find it fascinating how this look splits the room. Maybe the marmite would be an accurate name 😉
some of them look like they've had marmite smeared on them!I find it fascinating how this look splits the room. Maybe the marmite would be an accurate name 😉
imo, if you want you horn to stay shiney shiney, get a laquered one. this is my 7 year old SC RAW. everyone thinks it must be nearly 100 years old. I have given up trying to keep it shiney - it is what it is, and it play just how i like it.
i would'nt be too put off how it looks - if one spent time keeping on top of things it would probably look a whole lot better. tbh, i am a very dribbly player and it gets everywhere, but to me it is more important how my horn plays then how it look
imo, if you want you horn to stay shiney shiney, get a laquered one. this is my 7 year old SC RAW. everyone thinks it must be nearly 100 years old. I have given up trying to keep it shiney - it is what it is, and it play just how i like it.
I figured that a NEW “aged brass” sax like the Eastman 52nd Street, some P Mauriats, Canonballs, and Custom Signatures will not degrade/get verdigris because they’ve received some kind of a treatment to prevent it. I can’t imagine a new sax that was purposely made to look like that wouldn’t get some kind of stabilizing treatment. It just doesn’t make sense to me but I could be wrong.
Apparently, the look is very popular. The look of a vintage horn, but not. 😎
Thing is i got this horn because of how good it plays and sounds, not because i was bothered about having on that looked older then it really was. So the story is - these are great horns to play.I know nothing about this subject AT ALL but my initial reaction to this 'look of a vintage horn' is this it's all a bit 'shabby chic'. A piece of furniture that is genuinely old and showing the wear and tear of years of love is a beautiful thing; a piece of new furniture that has been purposely distressed to mimic that love is a shallow imitation. There's no story there.
(And don't get me started on jeans that come already ripped...)
I don't get why anyone would like the look of bare brass for its own sake. But then again I was sorely tempted to buy a red sax to learn on mainly because it would match my lounge rug so who am I to judge (I went for rose gold as it was a few bucks cheaper).😛
I'm not an expert on Vintage music, but it seems to me that most of the vintage Saxophone players I've seen on youtube and such, playing vintage Jazz seem to be playing quite shiny saxophones? Granted, it's not always easy to tell in B&W. So I'm quite happy that my nice shiny lacquered saxophone suits my vision of a vintage sax..but a bit newer...
You mean like this one? 🙂I agree that its not to everyones taste, but when I tried the above horn in the shop it could have been pink with dark blue spots and I would have still bought it, i bought it with my ears not my eyes, and the finish has grown on me over the years.
Perfect where can I buy it.
Perfect where can I buy it.
Not being owned by Dexter Gordon may reduce the value a bit as well.Actually wasn't that pink tenor a Selmer mk VI,i seem to remember it on SOTW a couple of years ago and wasn't it once owned by Dexter Gordon?
The one in the post above is not suitable it has to have factory fitted spots for me to buy it, adding the spots later reduces the value.
Here's my Amati, its 60 years old but was only stripped about seven years ago. It's never been cleaned other than a quick dust every now and then.
