Ligatures PPT Tenor - best ligature

Considering making a shim for my Vandoren Optimum using something like this, but thinner:

So your Optimum is not a natural fit? One note about mine is that it doesn't have any exchangeable plates like apparently currently available have. I got mine with a mouthpiece I bought from my teacher a few years ago and it didn't come with plates.
 
@saxyjt I should make clear, I've got a new Pillinger piece but not a PPT. It's an excellent Brilhart repro. But I'm using this thread because it seems I'm having a similar issue with that tapering of the piece and trying to find a good fit. What I really want is a metal lig too.

My Optimum has all 3 plates but that's negligible because they're all basically the same thickness. Going to try and stick a pad to one of the plates and see how that works.

Ed's been great and has suggested a shim too, until I find a lig that fits.
 
@saxyjt I should make clear, I've got a new Pillinger piece but not a PPT. It's an excellent Brilhart repro. But I'm using this thread because it seems I'm having a similar issue with that tapering of the piece and trying to find a good fit. What I really want is a metal lig too.

I have a similar issue with my PPT bari and I haven't been able to find a proper fix yet. Probably because I don't play bari enough... Or is it the other way around? :rolleyes:
 
Hi @Pete Thomas

Is this MKI the original 2 screw Marc Jean with the wooden rods? I notice on his website for his latest model he has two drop-down options for tenor ligs: a 'PPT' and a 'PPT Pete Thomas'...I don't suppose you know what the difference is?

All the best
Alex
That's funny, but I have no idea. We don't have different models based on being PPT or PPT Pete Thomas. All I can say is I prefer the original over the MKII.
 
Anyone have a Marc Jean MKI ligature to spare? 😉 Or know where I can get one?

I need my lig to sit fairly high up my MP. The reason we've had some contradictory opinions will be partly because of our preferred lig position (obviously reed type, MP & lig dimension variances etc, matter...)

Looks like I'll be trialling these ligs (no particular order):
  1. BG L13
  2. Rovner Star 2R
  3. FAXX
  4. BG Flex
  5. Syos
  6. Marc Jean MKI
If only I could go into a store that sold most of them. Bah.

Alex
 
Just to clarify a few things. The very first prototype PPTs were actually based on me messing around with a Vandoren Java, which was made from a Babbit blank. The previous year I had shown Jean Paul Gauvin of Vandoren my RPC, and he immediately though it was Java - Ron of RPC was using the same Babbit blanks.

I/we subsequently did some more messing and altered the chamber. And once Ed had put a different curve on it there were then three points that made it different to either a Java or an RPC (baffle, chamber and facing curve). It evolved/morphed into what I had in mind all along - something more akin to a Berg Larsen but better made. More consistency and better tuning on the majority of both modern and vintage saxophones. (This is just the tenor - the alto soprano and baritone are a different story.
 
I absolutely love my mouthpiece! That's what matters.

Just want to be clear that I'm not grumbling about the piece at all, I just want to get the most from it. It sings! The right lig will just help with my articulation and expression. :sax:
 
I need my lig to sit fairly high up my MP. The reason we've had some contradictory opinions will be partly because of our preferred lig position

Preferred lig position would only be relevant for mouthpiece with concave facings, or are distorted in some way. PPT mouthpieces have flat tables so ligature position (within reason) will not make a difference.
 
Last edited:

Similar threads... or are they? Maybe not but they could be worth reading anyway 😀

Social

New! Social Feeds

Look out for the navigation icon:

Follow CafeSaxophone

Latest Song of the Month

Trending

Forum statistics

Topics
32,034
Messages
577,653
Members
8,115
Latest member
kamosax ug
Back
Top Bottom