Yanagisawa tenors

Bobby G

Well-Known Member
Messages
4,642
Location
Wonderful Welwyn Garden City, Herts
I have a chance to purchase a Yanagisawa tenor, used, at a reasonable price. Apart from the obvious things, is there anything less obvious I should look out for in terms of potential problems? Any opinions on Yani's in general would be appreciated, re sound, playability, intonation etc. I imagine being a modern horn the keywork and intonation will be ok. It's a 901, and a few years old, I believe.

Cheers, Bob
 
I would say play it, look it over real good for unusual wear (flaring at the end of the key tubes, lots of soldering or whatever). Then play it some more. If you've got an "expert" available, get him to play it and examine it too.

Otherwise, I don't see how you can go wrong with the Yani 901. I don't think it's their top of the line model, but it should be a hell of a good horn. Roughly the equivalent to the Yamaha 62, I would say.

Yanagisawa has come out with several keywork improvements, which are gradually being adopted by other makers. These include double connector bars on the lower keys to eliminate lateral bending or movement. I don't know if the 901s have that stuff or not.

IMO, if you think the price is right and you like the way it plays, and looks, if that's important to you, then I don't think you can go wrong. (To me, the price would be right if I thought I could flip it on E-bay for a slight profit.
This
is the only 901 tenor auction currently in the Ebay database of sales completed in the last 30 days)
 
Hi Bob. I own a T991

The only difference as far as I know is that on the T901 the posts are soldered direct to the body of the sax. with the T991 it has ribs on the body and the posts are soldered to these.


This gives the T991 a more solid construction, but heavier!

As to the sound difference I don't believe there is any to speak of. I'm really dubious about all these people that go on about the difference in sound of different materials and construction techniques.

The major components of the sound I am sure are, in no particular order:

mouthpiece, reed, crook and the shape of your gob and very possibly the ligature. The actual sax and its materials come way down on the list

All those people who say the pink gold Yanis or solid silver ones have a better sound are simply looking for a plausible reason for spending **** loads of money to look cool.

And yes, in case you're asking, I would buy a sold silver Yani if I could afford it, I just love the way they look.

10 points for pose value and looking cool,

zero for better sound

By the way I love my Yani and I wouldn't swap it for anything!!
 
It's the lightest and best saxophone there is!

If you get one then you will never need buy another horn again (though I'm sure you'll manage to find some excuse Bob!)
 
What I put on the Sax On The Web forum, back in December:

"I have a yani 901 tenor (link NY mpc), and a yani 901 alto (barone mpc).

I love them both more than I love my wife!

Can anyone tell me what else there is to a sax that these two aren't giving me, cos as far as I reckon they're damn near perfect."



No-one managed to tell me owt.


http://www.saxontheweb.net/vbulletin/showthread.php?t=41294
 
"No-one managed to tell me owt."

Err, that you were able to view my friend! We DID have to delete a few comments from that thread to keep it clean and on track, however. 😉

Saxismyaxe
SOTW Staff
 
I bought it, I am really happy with it, if I can get it out of my gob long enough I'll take a picture and post it!

It's a 1995 'vintage' 901, as much cosmetic wear as you'd expect, but very sound, good pads, springs, corks etc, and sounds wonderful - even to a relative novice, self-taught, I can get a lot of sounds with my trusty Selmer Soloist mpc. Compared to the old Yamaha, I can liken it to cleaning the dust off the needle (ask yer dad). The other main thing, apart from the sound and build quality, is that it's really comfortable to play with my smallish crooked digits (I'd post a pic, but it'd be too much of a shock), everything is just where I want it.

OK, I think I am now sorted for saxes..... anyone wanna buy a YTS-23?

Cheers, Bob
 
Err, that you were able to view my friend! We DID have to delete a few comments from that thread to keep it clean and on track, however. 😉

Saxismyaxe
SOTW Staff

Yeah, that's only cos they've never met my wife!

8|
 
I have a mate with a Mark VI and a series one. I have to say that when I pick either of them up it just feels like my Yani.

I suspect that Yanagisawa did with Saxes what Yamaha did with guitars.

For my 21st birthday, I got a Yamaha FG 180 folk guitar. The story was that Yamaha took a Martin Dreadnought, disassembled it and then back engineered. The result was the FG series 140, 180 etc.
It was a bloody good guitar for the time and especially the price (early 70s). I've still got it upstairs though I never play it.
 
That's what the Japanese seem to do best, and if it makes quality instruments affordable and gets more people playing I'm all for it.

I was quite anti-Yamaha guitars for ages, played one and hated it, but eventually came to realise I'd just played a bad 'un. Of course, I love their saxes, I have two, although as you may have heard, one of them is for sale.

Cheers, Bob
 
Your YTS 23 is, I'm sure, a good horn, but a trainer horn at best. It won't have near the feel, balance or sound of the YTS 62, 61 or any of the custom yamaha models out now. Or, obviously, of the horn you just bought.

Yanagisawa, so the story goes, was a maker and repairer of Japanese instruments for decades prior to WWII, handling stuff like signal horns, ceremonial horns and trumpets. Some of that manufacturing capacity was sold in the early 50s and supposedly became the basis for Yamaha.

Meanwhile, Yani, in the early 50s got interested in saxophones, apparently due somewhat to the influence of the American soldiers who were stationed all over Japan after the war. The first horns were copies of existing horns. The Yani A-4 and A-5 horns, which appeared in the early 60s supposedly were reverse engineered from Selmer pro horns of the time, the Mark VI and Super Balanced Action.

I have an A-4 alto, stenciled as an "astro", which is a tremendous horn, although the keywork is thoroughly worn out. It's heavy and just wails. There's a pic of it somewhere on this site.

Yani kept improving things and finally started engraving their own name on all their horns long about the time of the 800/880 models. These are tremendous pro horns and are highly sought after by some. The 900/901/990 et al horns are a continuing upgrade from them.
 

Similar threads... or are they? Maybe not but they could be worth reading anyway 😀

New! Social Feeds

Look out for the navigation icon:

Follow CafeSaxophone

Trending

Latest Song of the Month

Forum statistics

Topics
32,008
Messages
576,616
Members
8,106
Latest member
gmaric22
Back
Top Bottom