Mouthpieces types of hard rubber mouthpieces

I have air left but it wont project any more
I'm not totally sure what you mean. If you mean how loud it can go, my answer would be the same as above - depends on tip + facing, air support, embouchure and reed.

My preference on tenor is for larger tips/shorter facings plus soft reeds

yep caught out in the cafe court again...British humour huh...can see the newspaper headlines now, off the cuff comment exposed as non scientific experiment...good seller
Perhaps make it more obvious when its humor?
 
of course, also different size mouthpieces, different reed strength, dare I say different ligs, different instruments. TBF the thread was about differences "I" found and last time I checked "I" was the same person. Also not about whether the JJ was a bright or dark ( Pleeeeease no) mouthpiece but whether a shiny rubber piece plays different than a dull rubber piece...in a light hearted way...😉
I was not commenting on the shiny vs. dull thing. I understand that was tongue-in-cheek. You stated that you found the JJ to be "dull and not resonant." I was saying my experience has been quite different. Same mouthpiece, two different players. Our unique physiology, playing experience, and air support are bigger factors than reeds, instruments, and certainly ligatures.
 
On a serious ( yet unsubstantiated/ proven note). Playing the JJ HR* I noticed that it kind of has a shut off point. I used a range of reeds up to 3s but could not project enough to cressendo on CBs youre my world. Would could that be chamber or tip size. It is a 6* with green Javas no 3.

Do all mouthpieces take as much air as you can give them then. I have air left but it wont project any more

@eb424 It seems you’ve done that experiment. But how do you know that it is not “projecting” any more? How do you measure that?
 
I was not commenting on the shiny vs. dull thing. I understand that was tongue-in-cheek. You stated that you found the JJ to be "dull and not resonant." I was saying my experience has been quite different. Same mouthpiece, two different players. Our unique physiology, playing experience, and air support are bigger factors than reeds, instruments, and certainly ligatures.
Think that was the other poster..
 
No, it was you. "The JJhr* is made of the duller hard rubber and has a sound to match, not dull but much less resonant." Your words. Come on, Eddie, own up to something. People are trying to help you.
Ill own it but thats not what i meant entirely. The only word I can use to describe it i that the Vandoren sounded well.. brittle. Thats what i mean by resonant. As though the reed was to soft. By not dull I guess I mean less brittle or warmer. Im not always so good with what i mean or puntuation. Like trying to help uncle jack of a horse..as oppossed to trying to help uncle jack, of a horse..s small but important difference..
 
And that’s why I am asking @eb424 for his definition. I am happy to share my concept of it after I hear from him.

Hint: If you are playing into a microphone or in a small space, it doesn’t apply.
17662513079589198698724518936907.webp
 
Ill own it but thats not what i meant entirely. The only word I can use to describe it i that the Vandoren sounded well.. brittle. Thats what i mean by resonant. As though the reed was to soft. By not dull I guess I mean less brittle or warmer. Im not always so good with what i mean or puntuation. Like trying to help uncle jack of a horse..as oppossed to trying to help uncle jack, of a horse..s small but important difference..
I know what you meant. I was just saying that I have a different experience. There's nothing wrong with that, and it's to be expected. We are all different, and in my opinion, it helps make the world a better place.
 

Social

New! Social Feeds

Look out for the navigation icon:

Follow CafeSaxophone

Latest Song of the Month

Trending

Forum statistics

Topics
32,047
Messages
577,918
Members
8,115
Latest member
Viljams
Back
Top Bottom