I'm a complete amateur and perhaps it's worth sharing the perspective of people like me.
I have no idea about mpc specs. Yes, I know about chambers and baffles but I find it hard to imagine how these translate into playing ability or sound. From what I picked up early on, I'd assumed that - whatever mpc/reed you chose, you'd still sound pretty much (85%) like you. Depending on the mpc/reed, maybe a bit brighter, maybe a bit darker, maybe a bit louder but still recognizably you. Also that the best players could play bright or dark with the same mpc. But I'm sure that - per person - some mpc's are easier to play than others.
Over 20 years, I gradually 'progressed' to wider tip openings, each time because I couldn't get enough air in the mpc to play at the volume I wanted (solo) without my reed closing up. Perhaps as a result of better breathe support/airflow/embouchure.
I once did a 'sax mpc test' that included an interview (what did I play? what did I want?), lung capacity and airflow tests and an embouchure test. Based on the results, the tester selected 5 or 6 mpc's for me to try out. One (little known German mpc) played like a dream. Exactly what I was looking for! The tester was independent, and took no orders or commission. I simply paid him his standard rate for testing (not only saxes but brass too).
I later bought a PPT and prior to this I had some DM conversations with
@Pete Thomas about which tip opening would be best to order, given what I played. He gave me good advice and my PPT has long been my preferred mpc.
Players at my level basically want a mpc that is easy to play and sounds good for the style of music they play.
So my only concern in this thread is that inexperienced members (like me) are putting 'specs' ahead of 'what's easy to play, what sounds good?'