jools
Member
- Messages
- 693
Reeds, reeds, reeds. All these threads about reeds. I'm reluctant to start another, but this is more of a scientific question if anything and the decisions involved seem to be based on a combination of that and personal taste. No other thread has touched on the idea of when - exactly - to abandon a 'favourite' reed and bring in a new one.
Just this week I have swapped over from a reed that has seen me through three or four gigs and maybe a hundred hours of rehearsing and practicing. The reason was that it was starting to struggle at either end of the range and the tone had become 'harsh'. Soon as I got out a new one I was back in my comfort zone with my 'head sound'
So why was the old one given the sack? - it would, in effect, play fine. With a little effort it could do the job, but I 'knew' something was wrong. The life had just been blown out of it. I am suspecting that this is a scientific issue to do with compression of the fibres, their inner 'hollowness' being blocked with a build up of proteins and skin cells, and the breakdown of the tip. Any chemists or scientists out there?
So, in other words, there seems to be a 'golden age' in the life of a playing reed, from being broken-in to being broken-down.
As beginners we would assume that the deterioration in our sound was our fault and a good teacher would simply tut and put a new reed on the sax for us. As experienced players we 'instinctively' know that it's just not playing out - as it did - and off it comes. But what happens to them? how and why do they 'wear out'?
Just this week I have swapped over from a reed that has seen me through three or four gigs and maybe a hundred hours of rehearsing and practicing. The reason was that it was starting to struggle at either end of the range and the tone had become 'harsh'. Soon as I got out a new one I was back in my comfort zone with my 'head sound'
So why was the old one given the sack? - it would, in effect, play fine. With a little effort it could do the job, but I 'knew' something was wrong. The life had just been blown out of it. I am suspecting that this is a scientific issue to do with compression of the fibres, their inner 'hollowness' being blocked with a build up of proteins and skin cells, and the breakdown of the tip. Any chemists or scientists out there?
So, in other words, there seems to be a 'golden age' in the life of a playing reed, from being broken-in to being broken-down.
As beginners we would assume that the deterioration in our sound was our fault and a good teacher would simply tut and put a new reed on the sax for us. As experienced players we 'instinctively' know that it's just not playing out - as it did - and off it comes. But what happens to them? how and why do they 'wear out'?
