Here's a non-political explanation. I've seen in more political places.What are the tariffs based on?
Here's a non-political explanation. I've seen in more political places.What are the tariffs based on?
You're right, but there's probably a better word than uncompetitive. Competitive suggests there is competition, whereas at the low end of the sax market, all saxes come from sources to be hit by high tariffs. There isn't any other source, and it is completely unrealistic to think that domestic manufacture will spring up in a market such as that for musical instruments. It simply means that in the markets 'protected' by high unliteral border tariffs, saxes will become expensive.I think with the threat of possibly 104% tariffs on Chinese goods will undoubtedly make the likes of Eastman, Bettersax, Jean Paul, Conn-Selmer and possibly Cannonball (not sure where they source their horns from) totally uncompetitive.
Your right Jon, maybe there might be a loophole for the US if these companies have their stock from a 3rd country eg they setup companies in the UK or some other low tariff country then ship from China to UK and then onto the US, I'm sure that they will be looking at all avenues if the threat materialises.You're right, but there's probably a better word than uncompetitive. Competitive suggests there is competition, whereas at the low end of the sax market, all saxes come from sources to be hit by high tariffs. There isn't any other source, and it is completely unrealistic to think that domestic manufacture will spring up in a market such as that for musical instruments. It simply means that in the markets 'protected' by high unliteral border tariffs, saxes will become expensive.
They're based on unilteral decisions to add a fee to goods crossing a border, in addition to any existing tariffs. There is nothing for international organisations to say or do for them to be brought into effect.I've been listening and read about the new tariffs. What are the tariffs based on? Are they based on adjustments on the tariffs that we have today? Right now it's nothing to talk about .... Is it a new world order we see? UN, WHO, WTO, Treaty of Paris ...... nothing to care about?
Back in the day,.when Hong Kong was a British protectorate, "make in Hong Kong" was a cover for "made in China" in the UK.there might be a loophole
So you are saying a UK company could import from China, rebadge it and sell to the US as imported from the UK?As this stand, it could be that "Made in Britain" becomes a cover for "Made in China" in the US?
No can do. Country of origin rules apply. Items made in China will still attract China tariffs even if transit thru UK.Your right Jon, maybe there might be a loophole for the US if these companies have their stock from a 3rd country eg they setup companies in the UK or some other low tariff country then ship from China to UK and then onto the US, I'm sure that they will be looking at all avenues if the threat materialises.


Sure. Which is already true for, for example, UK cars being exported to the EU - hence the whole car battery exemption / extension / manufacturing thing just last year or so.country of origin vs country of dispatch
What would happen if a Chinese company built a factory in another country in the same way Bentley and Rolls Royce which is made in the uk but Germany ownedNo can do. Country of origin rules apply. Items made in China will still attract China tariffs even if transit thru UK.
I’m going to set up a a smuggling operation in light goods across the MX and CA borders into the US. Going to become very very rich, RICH!! Just like the guy said. 😀😀😀![]()
Then it's UK manufactured. There are loads of examples of companies doing this, albeit less so with the Chinese owned ones. If the parts are manufactured in part overseas, they're liable to import duties and tariffs. In terms of onward tariffs (if the finished item gets sold to the US) how much they would get hit depends on how the country of origin rules are implemented. It could be in part, depending on the value of the (let's say) Chinese components in a UK made item. Could get complicated.What would happen if a Chinese company built a factory in another country in the same way Bentley and Rolls Royce which is made in the uk but Germany owned
Then the tariff would be the rate for the other country if the goods were made in there. Country of origin rules apply to where the product is made not who owns the factory. Bentley and RR will have tariffs for the UK applied to them, not German ones.What would happen if a Chinese company built a factory in another country in the same way Bentley and Rolls Royce which is made in the uk but Germany owned
They'd have to charge a lot more for their instruments unless the labour in that country was as cheap as it is in China. Would you pay £6K for a Made in England Jollysun?What would happen if a Chinese company built a factory in another country in the same way Bentley and Rolls Royce which is made in the uk but Germany owned
IMO, the latest stencil "intermediate" (called "premium beginner" ) sax from Selmer appears to be of Chinese origin. It is sold under the US label of Selmer as the Conn Selmer USA branch of Henri Selmer France. Notice the double supported bell lower note pad cups.I think with the threat of possibly 104% tariffs on Chinese goods will undoubtedly make the likes of Eastman, Bettersax, Jean Paul, Conn-Selmer and possibly Cannonball (not sure where they source their horns from) totally uncompetitive.

Or else it could be a very good unlikelihood. How would you/we know?It appears a very good likelihood that in essence, one is buying a Venus tenor as a Selmer.
