BigMartin
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 3,815
- Location
- Manchester, UK
Not really - in a big band it's more a case of Follow the Leader.
Different bands swing things to different degrees. Like Nick says, it depends on the speed. The best explanation of swing I've ever been given was the bouncing ball analogy; if you're playing a slow piece the swing rhythm is similar to bouncing a basketball or similar from about chest high, first quaver of the pair is when the ball bounces, second when your hand pushes it down again. As the music gets faster, your "hand" gets closer to the floor, and the gap between bounce and push gets more even.
This explanation works better in person, hope it made sense!
I think so, but I'm not always a good judge of what does/doesn't make sense ;}.
I don't mean to waste even more of your time, but this is what's confusing me. So if someone is playing (even) semiquavers and someone else is playing (swung) quavers, the 3rd semi doesn't coincide with the 2nd quaver and we get some kind of cross-rhythm. Is that right?Usually semi-quavers don't swing, if you wanted a 2:2:1:1 pattern you'd have to notate it as a triplet bracket over quaver:quaver😛air of semiquavers. The exception would be double-time for the whole band, which would either be written as such or if only temporary might be scored as dotted-semi/demisemiquaver pairs.
Cheers,
Nick
Thanks,
Martin

)
.
? That's the other thing I've learned about jazz: you have to be able to hear a lot more than I'm used to. My typical reactions to a jazz number are things like "that was pretty" or "that was fun" or in Bird's case typically "what the hell was that all about?". I guess it's just going to be a long road...
;}