CafeSaxophone Forum

Konstantin25
Last reply · posted in Saxophones: gear, playing, repair, impro
I am about to buy a new metal mouthpiece for my alto. I heard about Jody Jazz Super Jet.

Can you please give me some youtube videos of rock / r’n’r tracks where there’s that cutting edgy bright alto sound? Maybe ‘50 or ‘60 records. Please some players name. Unfortunately I don’t know them just heard some old rnr parts on TV ad and love this alto screaming.

Thanks.
33 Replies · 7294 views
Ivan
Last reply · posted in Saxophones: gear, playing, repair, impro
Not a political question, of course, and there's no need to discuss the DT

But, I've recently been in the market for an alto sax and watched the price, new, of a particular make and model rise over a few weeks, even before this week's tariffs were initiated

Given that sax parts for country-specific makes are often sourced from China, it looks to me that even the humble sax might be affected in price or availability, in some, or perhaps all countries... But I ain't an economist, so any informed discussion appreciated
464 Replies · 43777 views
  • Like
Reactions: aldevis
Andy Hornblower
Last reply · posted in Saxophones: gear, playing, repair, impro

Saxophones  C Melody Saxophones

I've been interested in C Melody saxes, for a while.

Apparently, they were quite common in the 1920s-30s, and the general concensus seems to be that the designs got better as time went on. Earlier models were often made in High Pitch (a tuning system that predates using A=440Hz), and should be avoided, unless you want to accompany a Highland bagpipe player.

From what little research I've done, it seems Conn made some of the better sounding ones, and their later models were improvements over the earlier ones. The ones with a "straight" neck, similar to an alto, are supposed to be good. Personally, I don't really like the S shaped neck on a tenor.

Anyway, here's one I've asked about recently. I've posted a couple of these pictures in Ads's review discussion thread of the Sakkusu C Melody sax, but here's all I have.

This is a 1924/1925 Conn C Melody, currently for sale at the Trevor Jones shop in Bristol. It's in low pitch, has had a partial repad, and is ready to play.



Bristol is a bit far for me to visit so I asked if they could send me photos, particularly of the hand positions, because the ergonomics are a bit different on these old saxes, and C melody saxes in particular.

DSC_0015.webp


Ermm... there seems to be a 2 file upload limit. Hopefully, that's per post

DSC_0016.webp


The thumb rest is apparently soldered on, so can't be adjusted easily, but the position looks good for reaching the right side trill keys (Bb/C/high E). This seems to be an issue on the Sakkusu / Thoman C Melody (see https://cafesaxophone.com/threads/sakkusu-c-melody-saxophone-review.13705/Ads's Sakkusu C Melody review[/URL])

The "L" stamped below the serial number indicates it's built for "Low" pitch - i.e. designed for modern A=440Hz tuning. I've read different accounts of what was meant by High Pitch (and maybe there was more than one definition), but the consensus seems to be it was at least A=450Hz, or A=453Hz - kind of between semitones, in modern tuning, and too far out to compensate for by positioning the mouthpiece differently etc.

It's important to check for that when buying any brass or woodwind instrument from that period. I think military bands kept it going for a while longer, in Britain. Scottish bagpipe and Irish/Scottish Bb flute players tend to still use it, as I understand it. It's certainly the normal tuning for 5 or 6 key Bb flutes.
679 Replies · 74359 views

Tone or Sound  subtone

is subtone supposed to be achieved by moving the bottom lip lower on the reed to dampen the sound? or is it achieved by just lowering/widening the airstream and keeping the embrochure the same?
found you can achieve a subtone by doing both but am not sure if one or the other is better, or if they can both be done interchangably. also i find doing the former (dampening the reed by moving the bottom of the lip lower on the reed) makes the sound slightly more thin and muffled than doing the latter variation of subtone.
0 Replies · 9 views
Pete Thomas
Cafe Moderator Commercial
Last reply · posted in Saxophones: gear, playing, repair, impro

The myth (or is it?)​


I had always assumed like many other players that, all other things being equal, high baffles with narrower tip openings would sound brighter and conversely with wider tip openings they would sound less bright (assuming the same baffle dimensions). This is based on the knowledge I gained from reading forums - I should have known better. I now know that to a certain extend this is a fallacy, but it isn't that simple.

ppt-baffle.webp

Some context for my new found wisdom:​

A customer asked about ordering a tenor PPT with a tip opening of 150 thou, a gobsmacking number 12 facing. The Hooliganissimo model. But, like me, he assumed that the baffle ought to be higher to compensate for the wider tip. He assumed that relative to the wide tip, the baffle was effectively lower and so would need to be made higher to compensate as he wanted it to be no less bright than his 130 and 140 PPTs.

So I discussed this with the expert Ed (Dr) Pillinger who makes the mouthpieces and his advice to not make the baffle higher was quite a revelation.

The theory that busts the myth​


As some of you may know, Dr Pillinger's original doctorate research into embouchure and oral cavity involved the use of an artificial embouchure. The artificial embouchure had a simulation of a person's lower jaw and lip which could be gradually tightened against the reed as air was pushed through (by a pump) to simulate the player blowing into the mouthpiece.

His apparatus had a simulation of the inside of a player's mouth that could be increased and decreased in volume and was designed to measure whether or not the oral cavity size made a difference. But he also made an interesting discovery about jaw tighness.

What he found was that as the air blew and he tightened the embouchure there was a fixed and measurable point at which the reed started to vibrate and sound started to be generated. So he could keep the mechanical embouchure at this point, remove the mouthpiece and measure exactly how "bent" the reed needed to be before making a sound. He was surprised to fine that (even with a relatively wide mouthpiece), the reed needed to bent a very large amount.

So this suggests that the wide tip opening effectively becomes much much smaller than we might imagine, hence the relative distance between the baffle and reed on a very wide tip may be about the same as it is on a medium tip opening.

However the difference may become audible once you get down to smaller sizes. For example I have noticed that although there is very little if any difference in brightness between an 9* and 11, there is quite a marked difference in tone between an 8* and a 7* - the 7* being not insignificantly brighter - especially when pushed. So I had always thought that to get the best sound from a high baffle you needed a wide tip. But that is only part of the story.
7 Replies · 100 views
  • Informative
Reactions: Wonko and ghostler
wakyct
Last reply · posted in Saxophones: gear, playing, repair, impro
Everybody knows the nice horns that get talked about all the time (Selmer, Martin, Yamaha, etc). Then there are the good instruments less talked about but I would say still fairly well known (a Yamaha Vito stencil for example).

How about a topic for those worthy saxophones (I'll leave the definition of worthy alone for now) that are rarely discussed?

Yesterday I 'discovered' the F.E. Olds Super:


Obviously beauty is in the eye of the beholder but I have to say that is a very cool looking alto! With an interesting story as well, that you can find if you dig a bit here or at the other forum.

So, what other models might fit the topic?
95 Replies · 1709 views
  • Like
Reactions: PigSquealer
Jay
Jay
Last reply · posted in Saxophones: gear, playing, repair, impro
I'm thinking of acquiring a secondhand Suzuki Van Van and learning to ride over the summer, the idea being that it will be fun, and more economical than my 4x4 for going to work and other short journeys, when the weather is reasonable. But on quite a few of those journeys I am accompanied by my tenor.

Anyone carry one on a bike, and got any advice please?
776 Replies · 84511 views
PiccoloPirate
Last reply · posted in Breakfastroom (chat and relax...)
Señor Pig,
Would like to know more about this bike/side car.
More pics?
Thanks.

Might make a side car for the kids and grandkids, for the '79 XT500, if they buy a ranch/farm in the Rockies.
Off road only.

IMG_7350.webp
26 Replies · 306 views
Hi, and many thanks to any members who respond!

My question is whether I should give my Tenor Sax a complete overhaul (very probably!) and if so, whether I should look for a sax repairer who has specific knowledge, skills and reputation of overhauling 'vintage saxophones'.

TBH, I've asked questions on this topic to 'Google AI' and I've got some valuable responses. For example, the difference between 'regular sax maintenance' and 'complete overhauls'. Down to which local 'repairers' would be best qualified to overhaul my specific sax and the questions that I should ask them beforehand! All based on my specific Tenor sax model and year. Another 'Google AI' conclusion was that - on average - periodic 'minor sax maintenance' should be done every 1-2 years. And a 'major overhaul' might be needed every 5-10 years. My sax has had neither in 20 years!

So what I would like from experienced. informed and human sax repairers are their opinions on the answers that I got from Google AI based on the 'background 'below.

Background
I bought my 1961 'Buffet Crampon Super Dynaction' Tenor Sax about 20 years ago. At that time, it had been thoroughly 'checked out' and played easily in comparison to other 'vintage saxes' that I tried out. In the 20 years since, I've had a few minor 'playing problems' quickly inspected and fixed' by my local 'clarinet/sax' lady. Usually free of charge. But in these 20 years, my sax has never had 'periodic maintenance' or 'overhauls'

Lately (for the past 6 months or more), I've been really struggling to play my sax. With certain notes (G/G# in the higher octave) 'squeaking'. In my local sax lady's opinion (within 5 minutes) she said that the 2 octave keys worked fine mechanically. So that any 'squeaks' were probably due to my 'embouchure'. Which hasn't changed in many years.

A new Tenor Sax player recently joined my Big Band. He had sax that looked to me 'unusual'. I asked him what it what it was and said it was a John Packer JP042 Bb Tenor. He explained that it was a 'temporary sax' while he was getting his Yamaha 'restored'. He added that he wasn't yet sure which one he'd stick with. With his permission I briefly tried out his sax with my mpc and reed. TBH the 'playability' of his (new) sax with mine was a huge difference between day (his) and night (mine)!

Yes I fully realize that the 'ergonomics' of saxes has moved on significantly between 1961 and the first mention of the John Packer JP042 on the cafe in 2011.

I 'Googled (AI)' my problem and it's advice (with recommendations) was to have my Tenor Sax refurbished (overhauled) by someone who has the 'credibility' of restoring 'vintage' (1961) saxes.
37 Replies · 689 views
... get along with?

Lots of folks double or dabble; but have you ever fancied adding an instrument but just could not come to terms with it (or them)?

Myself, I fancy a blues harp/mouth organ. I just don't get it. Luckily, trying costs little in that case.

«this thread brought to you by the Department of Idle curiosity »
31 Replies · 641 views
Tales from a pig that likes to stick his nose into everything.

Paint that S. How difficult could it be ?
1747869014621.webp


1) Search the net.
2) Find the color.
3) Order color.
4) Study task on University of YouTube, aka; For destruction by DYI presented by pro tech.
1747869824677.webp



1747869909688.webp


Do the cleaning & prep.
1747870236970.webp


Paint and cleanup / detail the edges with hard cotton swabs. Sounds easy……:confused:
1747870401847.webp


Yeah tha guy Matt makes it look easy.
Anyone remember your first experience cooking bacon crispy while still in the frying pan !
1067 Replies · 61467 views
DavidUK
Last reply · posted in Saxophones: gear, playing, repair, impro

Tech/maintenance  Abalone key pearls

Needed to order from Amazon so I added a set of these to see what they're like: Bnineteenteam Key Buttons for Alto Sax, 9pcs Sax Abalone Shell Key Buttons Saxophone Key Button for soprano, alto and tenor saxophones : Amazon.co.uk: Books

Not expecting much. Most of the "real shell" pearls I've looked at seem to be covered in acrylic which means they're no different than a plastic key surely?

Anyway... for a fiver it's worth a go. Let you know what they're like once they arrive.
77 Replies · 6906 views
S
Last reply · posted in Cafe Members' Recordings & Gigs

Beginner recording  body and soul

View: https://www.youtube.com/shorts/mQ9HpIYxaE0


not the best recording, played the head a bit messily, the reason the video is black is because i had my phone lying on the desk with the camera pointing down into the desk
been trying to work on my sound to get it to be large and warm
any tips or constructive feedback would be appreciated
5 Replies · 166 views
  • Like
Reactions: Veggie Dave
K
Last reply · posted in Saxophones: gear, playing, repair, impro
I bought this tenor saxophone a little over a year ago from my professor. I just recently picked it back up for a gig with friends. Out of curiosity, I wanted to do a little research into the sax to see if it was any good since I haven't played it much. I had never heard of this brand until my professor told me about it.

The brand is E.K. Blessing. However, I can not find a model number on it, at least not one that matches any of Blessing's model numbers. There are two numbers on the bottom back of the sax. I am attaching pictures.
1790281717364-73ba1d19-a808-4598-a432-115aec9c229a.jpg

1790282358425-fa19a5ea-a1e4-45cf-b662-315cb185490c.jpg

1790282533670-c5161e3e-e3e4-4ef7-ae69-d83879d0212d.jpg

1790282605274-3a17eafd-404e-43eb-83e9-191e19511d16.jpg


I was hoping you all could work your magic on this one for me. Since I have so far found nothing. I have posted this on a few Sax subreddits, but they aren't doing me any good. I figured a saxophone-focused forum could help a bit more.
14 Replies · 336 views
S
Last reply · posted in Saxophones: gear, playing, repair, impro
my jaw is slightly recessed, not too bad but it is not even with my upper lip
i can still get an alright sound but should i be purposefully putting my lower lip foward in order to compensate for this?
i find forcing the lower lip further foward does make the reed feel like its more free, and easier to get altissimo notes. but long term it feels a bit uncomfortable and unnatural so i find myself subconsciously putting my lower lip further back over time
6 Replies · 166 views
Grumps
Last reply · posted in Breakfastroom (chat and relax...)

Recipes  What's Cookin'?

This is the one for pictures of food. Time for Superbowl chili!

20260208_162436.webp


I make it every year for the game, whether I watch it or not. In a pot I actually won... at a chili contest.

Now how 'bout a bowl of red:

20260209_181449.webp
141 Replies · 7696 views
  • Like
Reactions: PigSquealer

Try our new Social Feeds

Look out for the navigation icon: . You can now set default social feed view (nested & infinte scroll) in your account preferences.
You can easily switch to regular forum view any time.

Trending

Latest Song of the Month

Forum statistics

Topics
32,280
Messages
576,600
Members
8,090
Latest member
nelius
Back
Top Bottom