• New!

    Try our new Social Feeds, look out for the navigation icon: . You can now set default social feed view in your account preferences.

series2/series 3 selmer

as far as I know the series 3 is designed for classical work, not jazz. As such it's design agenda is super-high presicion (oops, spelling ) at low volumes. it's also a bit brighter.... So, not really advantages, just a bit different.
 
I have a Series 3 alto and a Series 2 tenor, so it's not quite comparing like with like. However,

I would characterise them as follows: The series 3 is quite bright and "in your face". Would be perfect for funk or playing in a band with amps, guitars and drums. I have found I am looking for a slightly darker mouthpiece for this horn to reign it in a little.

Series 2: More "restrained" so to speak, but I find the sound a little more complex. Less brash, but almost a little "richer" if you can characterise the sound. However, you have to push a little harder on the series 2. Not an instant "In-your-face" effect like the series 3.

Also, palm keys are lower down and if you're used to them being in your hand, I now have to reach for the E palm key. I am finding it really rewarding to play the series 2 because the more I learn about breath control, diaphram support and airstream support, the better it sounds. Need quite a free-blowing mouthpiece though because it runs the risk of sounding a little muffled with the wrong setup.

Still fine-tuning both these horns and how to play them, but I really didn't like the series 3 tenors I playtested. Series 2 altos were quite similar in characteristics to the tenor, as described above.
 

Similar threads... or are they? Maybe not but they could be worth reading anyway 😀

Trending

Latest Song of the Month

Forum statistics

Topics
32,245
Messages
575,420
Members
8,072
Latest member
Max18
Back
Top Bottom