I have to admit, when i brought the shabby sax to Norway from the UK, the customs guy looked at me with utter distain and waved me through. So he must've also known stuff about saxophones.said the guy at the Swedish custom
I have to admit, when i brought the shabby sax to Norway from the UK, the customs guy looked at me with utter distain and waved me through. So he must've also known stuff about saxophones.said the guy at the Swedish custom
That’s such a flawed question. Why would anyone want to enter the US?If you enter the US with a recent saxophone and you don't have a proof of origin how will customs react?
a: clearly a chineese saxophone, the tariff is 145%
b: that one is made in Vietnam, the tariff is 10%
c: That looks Asian, but our ai can't recognize it, so we take it in for further research.
If you are on a tourist visa, probably not. If on a work visa that’s a different matter.Should I get an inventory of everything of value in my custody as I leave the US?
😄😟That’s such a flawed question. Why would anyone want to enter the US?
To be a little boring... Get a carnétOn the other hand, if I were to travel with any of my instruments, it has been a long while since I had a receipt for their purchase, so how am I to prove when it was purchased… or even that it is mine?
Seems a bit of a convoluted way to plug their mouthpieces, but nothing to do with this discussion re: tariffs.Here's Jay Metcalf's slightly oblique take on some aspects of this discussion
View: https://youtu.be/wWBlbG4Qo9A
To do with manufacturing (pro level) saxophones, stateside; which has been discussed in this thread.but nothing to do with this discussion re: tariffs.
I watched the video. He basically states what occurred, but did not get into the factors as to why sales declined and could no longer be competitive. Over time I've learned why, but now we delve into politics which I do not care to get involved with.Oblique indeed, he doesn't really answer the question does he? It's a good historical review though assuming it's accurate.
If buying used within the country, IMO it may inflate a little due to the rising cost of inflation, but it is indeed a viable alternative. With the increase in new sax prices, may make it worthwhile to keep one's older sax repaired or buy a recently refurbed older sax in like new playing condition.edit: I'm most interested in the tariff discussion wrt to the used market. So far I haven't noticed much difference in what's available locally though I expect there'll be a lag of a few months.

😎On the assumption that used prices tend to maybe be around 50% of new prices, it may be fair to assume they will go up in line with the new price of the same, or equivalent, instrument. Hence about 10%If buying used within the country, IMO it may inflate a little due to the rising cost of inflation, but it is indeed a viable alternative. With the increase in new sax prices, may make it worthwhile to keep one's older sax repaired or buy a recently refurbed older sax in like new playing condition.
BetterSax and Jean Paul saxes are made in China.I'm guessing that the BetterSax and Jean Paul are put together in Taiwan.
Hong Kong will suspend service from 27 April, so anything currently in transit should be OKHong Kong just suspended postal service for US-bound goods.
Depends what you mean by "OK". Tariffs are in place already.so anything currently in transit should be OK
"Hong Kong post will definitely not collect any so-called tariffs on behalf of the US.”
Not with me. The US maybe.Is there some confusion here?
I didn't mean you. I posted in the wrong place and have asked the admins to delete my post! Sorry mizmar. It seems that we can't delete our own posts!!Not with me. The US maybe.
What you said is the same as I said.
But yeah, that is what's weird about the US asking HK Postal to pay the tariff. Which is what it says in the grawniad article.
