I don’t know that it isWhy is a 280 made in Japan better than a 280 made in Indonesia? How do we know this? I think a big company like Yamaha is doing lots of quality controls.
I don’t know that it isWhy is a 280 made in Japan better than a 280 made in Indonesia? How do we know this? I think a big company like Yamaha is doing lots of quality controls.
I don't think it matter so much "were and who" when it comes to saxophone manufactoring. The mexican saxophone workers were good. They were just doing was they wer told to do. It doesn't help if the owner or the mangement don't know anything about (saxophone) manufactoring.So you’re basically saying that even made in China it could be a great instrument.
I don’t know what you are talking about.
Is tone boosters some special thing that makes my saxophone sound better?
Then you state all I need is paper towels.
I’m a tad confused?
That’s a REALLY good question worthy of answering. The SML is an excellent horn. The sound is gorgeous. I hadn’t played in a while so was expecting to sound like a strangled goose but was delightfully surprised to hear a beautiful sound coming out of it. Last night I managed to fix the G# so now that works and the pads don’t look like they need replacing.I think the "Made in Japan" issue is probably a red herring - a 280 is a 280 wherever it is assembled.
However the warranties offered by dealers in different countries vary, and sometimes they do not apply worldwide - so you need to be careful that you don't end up without a guarantee on your imported sax. or with a guarantee that would require you to send it back to Japan to remedy any faults.
But I'm a bit confused why you want to buy a Yamaha 280 when you own an SML.
I am the last person to want to dampen anyone else's GAS urges, but I think most people would say that the SML is a better instrument, and you should be able to get it set up in top condition for less than the cost of a Yamaha.
If you want to start playing right away while your SML is getting serviced then maybe you could hire a saxophone for a short period.
I don't know what the situation is in Canada, but in the UK, the large saxophone shops mostly have instruments for hire.
Really? I’m learning so much so quickly here. The Internet truly is a wonderful thing sometimes. Thank you so much.Sorry, resonators/reflectors/"tone boosters" is what we call resonators. Martin Company called them tone boosters. Use to be plastic or metal in middle of the saxophone pad. If you dry the saxophone pads after playing you don't need to clean them! I sometimes use a strong kitchen paper to dry the pads. To avoid mistakes use "pad paper". I use a pad stick the can be washed.
pictures of oversized brass resonator, how to use pad paper, and "pad-stick" .
View attachment 11883View attachment 11884View attachment 11885
But I'm a bit confused why you want to buy a Yamaha 280 when you own an SML.
The article you have linked to refers to Yamaha student line of instruments and not all Yamaha wind instruments.
As far as I am aware Yamaha's pro line of instruments whether they are drums, wind instruments, and acoustic guitars are all made in their Hamamatsu factory complex near Tokyo. A lot of their other products are made around the world in places like China, Indonesia and Malaysia. I also read years ago Yamaha had assembly facilities in Germany for the European market and in the US at Grand Rapids, Michigan obviously for the North American market.When purchasing any product especially on-line research and due diligence is paramount.
I personally own 3 Yamaha saxophones made in Japan and all they all play very well, a Yamaha acoustic guitar made in China that is a great instrument, and a Yamaha electronic keyboard made in Malaysia that is fantastic. I also own some Yamaha hi-fi gear made in Malaysia that is excellent. I have also owned Yamaha motorcycles as well...
Greg S.
My SML can play all the low notes very nice as well as every high note. It can play every note right now except for middle & high C# but I’m working on it. It’s a very nice saxophone with a very nice tone so worst case scenerio is that I get two great playing saxophones.A SML in good playing condition use to be a better player compared to a Yamaha 280. For some weeks ago I played with a guy that had bought a SML Rev D tenor for 17000.00 s e k. My G4M is a better player. I had to play the lower tenor part of te song "In the Midnight Hour" because his sax couldn't play down there. I bouhgt the G4M tenor for 2000.00 s e k!! They use to call SML's for mkVI killers! I would say a G4M is a Rev D killer!
My SML can play all the low notes very nice as well as every high note. It can play every note right now except for middle & high C# but I’m working on it. It’s a very nice saxophone with a very nice tone so worst case scenerio is that I get two great playing saxophones.
Which ones do you have ?I have 2 Yamaha altos and a soprano.
I really love the brand.
Well I don’t know! All I know is when I go from a natural C to a C# not much changes. It’s certainly not a semi tone transition.What's the problem with middle and high C#? As that's no fingers, or no fingers with the Octave Key, how is there a problem with producing the note?
Well I don’t know! All I know is when I go from a natural C to a C# not much changes. It’s certainly not a semi tone transition.
My SML can play all the low notes very nice as well as every high note. It can play every note right now except for middle & high C# but I’m working on it. It’s a very nice saxophone with a very nice tone so worst case scenerio is that I get two great playing saxophones.
Yes, SML saxes are good. But a little bit overrated, IMO. Been lost of good writing on internet about SML the last years and that pumped up the prices. In the late 70's they were not mentioned to be among the best saxes. Selmer , Buffe and Yamaha were the big 3 back then. But SML's are very good saxes.
I’ve seen some cool really cool sax straps though so I’m interested in trying something new.
I had the opportunity to play a 62 and a couple of equivalently priced horns on a trip to Sax.Co.UK earlier in the Year I have to say the 62 underwhelmed me, to say the least...
As I wrote before SML saxes are pretty common here in Sweden. For me and my freinds (born in the 50's) it was posssible to buy a used Rev D or Gold Medal in the 70's for less money. I know four guys who owns SML tenors. But they are not playig thier saxes. To bring back an old SML sax in good playing condition is quite expensive. So they are on more modern saxes; Selmer,, Keilwerth, Yamaha ... . My former sax tech here in Sweden was trained and worked also for SML, Paris for some years in the late 60's and early 70's. I was close to buy is alto but I didn't do it. I don't play alto. But I have some new SML reeds. It's better to own SML reeds instead of a SML alto. Less money and they don't need any service!!
View attachment 11892
It's about personal taste. But I wouldn't assume that the next sax you fall in love with has to be a Yamaha @SaxyNikki
In fact if the SML stirs your soul, I wouldn't be surprised if you found a Yamaha a tad underwhelming. If you can, play as many examples of sax before you buy... easier said than done, I know, if you live in the boondocks