Tech/maintenance SHWoodwind Updates

How did you know? I thought I was the only one doing that...
One likes to look one's best.

paint claws.webp
 
Couple of site updates today:

First up is a test prompted by Ivan's question about leaving acid on a horn. No change after five weeks - which means it's unlikely that anything much will happen:


And a new entry in the Benchlife Blog - making tin whistle buttons (AKA a thumb rest)


shwwimg_whistlesTW.webp
 
The Kooiman is a good design, but has a significant flaw that precludes it from use on whistles - namely the band that wraps around the body tube.
Flutes have raised holes and keys, so the fingers never get anywhere near the body tube. On a whistle the fingers are resting right on it - and the forefinger will always be directly above the thumb.
 
Another little update to keep you amused for a couple of minutes during these trying times.
It's a mini-review of the Martin Magna alto. I've bunged in on the end of the Committee III review, given that it's....well...go see...


shwwimg_martin_magna_alto_bellTW.webp
 
Stephen, I enjoyed your review. Thanks.

I owned a Magna alto once. It was fantastic.
It had the best sounding lower octave of any alto Ive tried ( I’ve tried probably everything out there !! )

It was the closest thing to a tenor ever.

I needed money at one point,and it was a choice between the Magna or my Mark 6.
I sold the Magna. I always wish I could have kept it.
( but I still have the mk 6, so it was the right choice )

So, just to come to a point you raised.
I’m pretty certain that my Magna had the left hand thumb mechanism that your review version doesn’t have.
ie , mine was like your mark 3 version, with the lovely shaped/sculpted mechanism. It must have been an earlier version, but I cant remember the serial number
 
When "Magna" model came in c 1955 (according to my info) it was when Selmer had big days in USA. Both Conn and Buescher have thrown in thier towels. King had the Super 20 Sonic model. I have "The Martin Tenor" and "The Martin Magna Tenor (1959). I think the Magna is slighty beter. Just a liite bit. I agree that I wouldn't pay all the extra money for a Magna. I bouhgt my Magna for 2000 sek in 1985 with two Berg Larsen metall bullet mpc that came along. Although I'm close to buy low A Magna. But it' too much money. Here is a picture of a low a Magna bari from a book. ("Sax & Brass Book"). Red Tyler on bari?
magnabb.jpg
 
I used to have a Committee III and now have a Skyline which is focused but with a fuller and rounder tone than the III, yet it can play from woody classical to screaming blues. Both Bird and Pepper played Martins at the start of their careers, before they got in to the endorsed freebies they pawned for smack. The thing is heavy and tough, like a club. The keywork is quick, just a shade off the Selmer series III quick from D to C#. To hit it‘s full potential the Skyline/Searchlight needs a knowledgeable tech experienced in setting these up because there is a stud that needs to be bent carefully to sort the tuning above top C and the bell keys system balances springs against each other and needs to be set a fraction away from flapping free to play with the same pace and fluidity as the rest of the keywork. The octave key and Bb are so comfortable and easy I don’t understand why these designs aren’t the norm.
 
Does having the octave key on the crook rather than below the joint make a diference in sound in the top octaves.
That is a good question. Gary Scavone in his dissertation indicates that the register hole on a conical woodwind should be located 1/2 the distance from the imaginary apex of the "missing cone" to the first open tonehole. For the "neck octave" the ideal "compromise" location for saxophones is 1/2 the distance from the apex to the open tonehole that vents the note B. For the body octave, the ideal "compromise" location is 1/2 the distance from the apex to the opening that vents the note F. Notes on either side of these values will be sharp to a certain extent when played with the octave key.

Given that, insofar as those conditions are met, on a bari sax it should not make a difference whether that location falls on the "crook" or below it, unless perhaps the tone is affected somehow by the different taper and length of the different "crooks".
 
Last edited:
Asked the octave key question as I noticed it's location on the picture of the Martin bari.

Older baritones, I think from all the manufacturers including Conn, Martin, Selmer, Buescher, Buffet, had the upper octave pip on the neck.

You can search around The Vintage Saxophone Gallery :: SaxPics.com for hours and see which model baritones from which manufacturer had an octave pip on the neck. For instance pre-war Selmer baritones did until the Balanced Action model in the late 1930s.

The neck was also longer than on most modern baritones because the point where the neck changed to the main instrument bore (start of the pig tail) was further down the cone. The neck of a tenor is always longer than on an alto, but the baritone is shorter than tenor, just because the break point in the whole instrument tube is a smaller proportion, presumably for ergonomic reasons more than acoustic ones.

Of my baritones the Selmers have a short neck with no octave pip on it and the Conn (1931) and Buffet (late 1960s) have longer necks with an octave key.

As others have said, the placement of an octave pip is a compromise as it should theoretically be slightly different for each note it serves. On the baritone either scheme (upper octave pip on neck or not) seems to work well enough.

Lots of professionals still play the old Conn 12M baritones (with the neck octave pip) and sound great on them.

Rhys
 
So, just to come to a point you raised.
I’m pretty certain that my Magna had the left hand thumb mechanism that your review version doesn’t have.
ie , mine was like your mark 3 version, with the lovely shaped/sculpted mechanism. It must have been an earlier version, but I cant remember the serial number

I can't find any examples with this design of octave key fitted, and I would have said that perhaps they were using up what remained of the Comm.III stocks in store - but the two models ran concurrently for quite some time. Bit of a puzzle.
 

Social

New! Social Feeds

Look out for the navigation icon:

Follow CafeSaxophone

Latest Song of the Month

Trending

Forum statistics

Topics
32,046
Messages
577,881
Members
8,114
Latest member
old hippie
Back
Top Bottom