I haven't got many teeth left so I don't care ! 😉I've tried metal mpcs but I don't get on with them - I dislike the vibration through my teeth.
I haven't got many teeth left so I don't care ! 😉I've tried metal mpcs but I don't get on with them - I dislike the vibration through my teeth.
I suspect my aversion is due to some oddities with my biteI haven't got many teeth left so I don't care ! 😉
I would agree, but the only mouthpiece I damaged due to a drop in 50 years was metal ( hope I am not tempting fate here), I dropped a custom alto LAW metal in the sink whilst washing it and damaged the tip, luckily Laurie only lives 15 mins from me and he rectified it while I waited.They are more likely to survive a drop, but not always.
I agree. I have had v bright HR pieces but when pushed hard, they seem to reach a buffer which has a particular sound, not so with bright metal pieces.I keep feeling that the higher partials, those creating the sparkle and white noise on top of the tone, better get through with metal pieces.
Of course you can! Have you ever seen a Dukoff metal mouthpiece?...You cannot mold a metal mouthpiece! ...
I haven’t seen many here making that argument of “metal is brighter because it is metal”.The material of the mouthpieces makes no difference, don't fall into the line of thinking that some will say that metal is brighter and HR is darker, some of my darkest have been metal and brightest have been HR, the main reason that players pick metal will be the profile, metal tends to be a slimmer profile than it's HR equivalent, but go with the sound whatever the mpc is made of.
I agree that there exists a boundary condition in extreme instances. The Morgan Excalibur comes mind - I found it to have a harsh character when pushed.I think it can possibly make a slight difference, but only when the material at the tip is thin enough, ie when there is no significant baffle. This is something Ed Pillinger has noticed but it isn't necessarily metal vs HR
No you are right there are not many here making that quote but I have seen some retail websites that have made that claim that most metal are brighter and most HR were darker, not sure if it's still there but sax.co.uk was one such site.I haven’t seen many here making that argument of “metal is brighter because it is metal”.
If they do, then hand them an early Otto Link or a Goldbeck.
Retail websites can say any damn foolishness they want. Most of it's lies. Remember "Lies, damn lies, and statistics"? Well, in 2025 it's "Lies, damn lies, and marketeering".No you are right there are not many here making that quote but I have seen some retail websites that have made that claim that most metal are brighter and most HR were darker, not sure if it's still there but sax.co.uk was one such site.
As a side note just checked sax.co.uk, that blog is not there and it seems to have been done again correcting the original.
Ok. the Dukoffs I have had (vintage) were brazed together.Of course you can! Have you ever seen a Dukoff metal mouthpiece?
The mold for a rubber mouthpiece and the mold for a metal mouthpiece work the same way. There's a core - from what I've seen, generally two pieces, the window/baffle part withdrawing toward the tip and the chamber/cork bore part withdrawing toward the cork bore, then at least two exterior halves. As long as you make sure there's appropriate draft on each surface, you're good to go.
Yes, my own ultem tenor pieces are extremely thin at the beak to the point where I can feel the tip vibrate. There is a point when I machine the beak where I hear the transition from "clonk" to "ding" and that's when I know I am there.I think it can possibly make a slight difference, but only when the material at the tip is thin enough, ie when there is no significant baffle. This is something Ed Pillinger has noticed but it isn't necessarily metal vs HR
Can a Grafton sax be picked out? 🤷🏻♂️ Never had one, but Pete has..
