By Ads account (and he does have a Yamaha bias, especially for the earlier ones) you're getting a new purple logo for a substantial discount over a well used original. That's a pretty strong statement, especially coming from him..
Soundwise yes (it`s that neck) , as I said , the action isn`t as slick as a sweet spot (late 80s) Purple logo 62 , how much of this is because the 89 horn has been well loosened up with age I don`t know, the 62-III and 280 may feel like this in 25 years time.. I wasn`t knocked out with the action on the 62-III I had even after Stephen Howard had "Sax-Whispered" it compared to the Japanese 275 given the massive price difference , it left me expecting more for the £1800 the things cost new ...
To the OP -- also the review is pertaining to the
Alto , the Tenor may be a pile of poo, there certainly is a big difference between a YTS275 and a 62 Purple logo Tenors I`ve played , sadly even with Yamaha (and Yani) , you can`t automatically assume that a model is great because another size of horn of that model is good - for instance, the YSS-475-II Soprano is a Damn sight closer in feel and build to a YSS-875EX than the Tenor versions of the two model numbers are .
For me , as a Tenor player who only "hobbies" on Alto the YAS-280 is good enough for me to sell the Purple Logo 62 (and it leaves me breathing space to add something totally diff like an SA80 as well) .... for an only tenor (I gig) I`d prefer a Purple Logo or a RAW or a MkVII - Why? because I WANT one .
Stephen Howard (Haynes Sax manual author and one of the top Sax Techs) who is a better sax player than I`ll ever be exclusively played and gigged a YTS-23 which is a cruder, simpler older version of the YTS-280 , I`m sure your tutor would choke and splutter if you said you`d set your heart on one of those
😱
😉