... Or glam rock?!Not necesarily..... 😀
The list is endless and we're all pretty good at reading the semiotics of clothing...
Last edited:
... Or glam rock?!Not necesarily..... 😀
Whilst appearing to be dressed the standard clothing his was of course of far better quality and cut.Personally, I think Mao got it righ.
Gandhi was clear, his dress was to signal resistance against the British occupation and India being force fed cotton from the midlands (and slave plantations) destroying the indigenous textile industry. I'm not sure walking around in a loincloth, in -10⁰C, would carry the same message!Whilst appearing to be dressed the standard clothing his was of course of far better quality and cut.
How about Gandhi for a fashion role model?
Interesting, I'd not thought of it in terms of respect for an audience. Nine times out of ten my gigs are fairly grungy and I'm better/ more flamboyantly dressed than the majority of the crowdI always dressed up in some respect.
As that situation now appears to have been reversed maybe the inhabitants of the midlands should give it a try, give the rest of us a laugh anyway.Gandhi was clear, his dress was to signal resistance against the British occupation and India being force fed cotton from the midlands (and slave plantations) destroying the indigenous textile industry. I'm not sure walking around in a loincloth, in -10⁰C, would carry the same message!
Good point well made;As that situation now appears to have been reversed maybe the inhabitants of the midlands should give it a try, give the rest of us a laugh anyway.
