Playing the saxophone Mic and effects for playing live?

But therein lies the difference - from Shure themselves:

The 57 and 58 microphones are actually based on the same cartridge design. The main difference is in the grille. The SM58 was designed for vocal applications, and therefore uses a ball grille with built in pop filter to eliminate plosives.

The SM57 is designed as an instrument microphone, where a smaller grille size is more practical and plosives are less of a concern. Subsequently, the SM57 does not use a ball grille with pop filtering and instead features an integral resonator/grille assembly, where the grille is actually part of the cartridge.

Each grille design places the diaphragm of each microphone in a different acoustical environment. The distance from the top of the grille to the diaphragm is shorter on the SM57 compared to that of the SM58, which allows for a more pronounced proximity effect through closer mic positioning. Additionally, the different resonator/grille assembly design of the SM57 produces a slightly higher output above 5 kHz.

​

It's All a Matter of Microphone Application​

Although the SM57 was originally intended for instrument applications, there are plenty of examples through music history of it being used as a vocal microphone. This is because the increased proximity effect – and 5KHz frequency boost – can be used to the engineers advantage with certain vocalists. In other words, the same qualities that help instruments, can sometimes also bolster certain voices. It's all a matter of what works for your application. Experimentation, and using your ears remains the key factor.

So there you have it, they're actually pretty similar, with subtle, but potentially significant differences.
Wow, @Pete Effamy, many thanks for this detailed comparison! In our small rehearsal room, I don't really need a mic. But it would be good to get used to playing with a mic before I might need to use one for a performance.
 
Most common use for a 57 is as a snare mic. It is great on sax though I think the 58 has more body. The differences are more apparent when doubling on clarinet. The BBC used to rotate sound engineers and one always gave me a 57 which I didn’t like on clarinet. The 58 was fine.
 
I've never had to mic a sax, but will try using the little clip-ons, attached to a wide brimmed Stetson, as I do with flutes, and see how it sounds.
Beyer M201N(C) is what I use if there's room for a stand.
For flutes and acoustic six string.
Tried those red velcro mic clips on the flute's HJ, but don't like anything attached to the instrument.
MXR makes the flutes sound natural and just louder.
Most of my loud playing in public was on Bass Guitar long ago.
Jazz, Rock and Riding the Purple Sage.
Before that, on Tenor, big band, symphonic band and quartet club date work, with piano, drums, sax/clarinet and electric jazz box guitar. People danced but were quiet as others just listened.
We always played pretty. :clapping:
FullSizeRender.jpeg
 
Last edited:
And control your own sound/volume : )
One guy I used to play with tried to achieve to old Rock & Roll and Blues venue sound from the 50's and 60's. Just the vocals going through the small PA. All instruments had their own amps including the sax, keyboard, harmonica ... . When I blow into a microphone I used a 15" active stage monitor/speaker with a SM 57 or SM 58 (no phantom power) or a JTS clip-on microphone (needs phantom power, a pre-amp was necessary) but the settings were limited. Level, treble and bass, so easy the that even I understood 😉. No reverb. We played noisy and high energy "pubrock". I liked it. Easy for us. And beside, we didn't have to carry a lot of stuff. Less money as well. Here around, playing live for our band, has more or less vanished. We just can't blame everything on the pandemic. To carry, connect, do sound check .... when we were just playing 10-15 songs (Berry, Little Richard, Jupp, Larry Williams, Springsteen, CCR ...) in an up-tempo and with high energy. We got more positive comments when we kept it simple. So it was all very simple. The music was easy as well. The easy and unpretentious music styles has became too complicated?
 
Last edited:
We got more positive comments when we kept it simple. So it was all very simple.
Once in a while I sit back and think about the old days with the 1960s Kustom vintage columns and tuck & roll PA amp. The two Kustom columns stood tall behind us on either side of the stage. No feedback at all. No stage monitors (hate them), no in-ear monitors, no rackmount effects, no mic on the guitar amp, no stage volume issues, no mics on the drums and no so called sound person. It served us well for many years.

Our main "party" band today is very close to the same setup. Excellent clear sound.
 
Ive got the nux. Great mic but died after a year no after care in the uk. Make sure to take out the extended warranty. Also cloud vocals great comes with an effects box, that requires 240v. I also bought a spare seperate mic so as there are no charging issues.
 

Similar threads... or are they? Maybe not but they could be worth reading anyway 😀

Social

New! Social Feeds

Look out for the navigation icon:

Follow CafeSaxophone

Latest Song of the Month

Trending

Forum statistics

Topics
32,049
Messages
577,924
Members
8,115
Latest member
Viljams
Back
Top Bottom