- Messages
- 697
- Location
- USA
It would be interesting to look at a section of one under a microscope, compared to an unmodified reed.
Possible, I guess.resin which is infiltrated as a liquid into the long hollow fibres
The patent says “matrix with randomly distributed suspended cane particles’ and ‘concentration of approximately 0.5-10% by volume and at least a majority of the cane particles in the resin matrix can be less than 100 micrometers’"The first one the arrived was cut off centre at the camp, and the heart wasn’t central; and it played badly"
"At that price I’d like one reed to play identically to the next"
Hope and prayer?
Since it's cane, and each piece of cane is not exactly the same, maybe they have an analyzer, to check each piece of cane, and vary the amount of what they use to make their reeds special, or do they clone the GOAT cane? 🧐
Just did a quick search and this might be a fun reed, I mean read.
Will try to find their patent info later.
US11676562B1 - Synthetic reed with cane particles - Google Patents
A synthetic reed for use with a woodwind instrument includes a synthetic resin matrix with randomly distributed suspended cane particles. Synthetic fibers, which may comprise one or more different material filaments, may also be impregnated within resin matrix. The cane particles can be present...patents.google.com
Hi PeteHi Matt, have been unhappy with alto reeds for a long time, so read this and also looked at Jim Cheek’s review from Sax(.co.uk).
Back story is that Pete’s are definitely becoming one: I think I’m going towards Pete (Thomas’ssss’ - sorry Pete, is it an ‘s or just an ‘ ?) and his soft number 2 (that came out wrong… um, in more ways than one)…
So I ordered the 2+ (like a 2.25 I guess). It’s too hard. And quite dull really. A reed I’d use for a Desmond-type gig. Bottom of vamp cut quite off-kilter too like yours, if that has any bearing.. certainly doesn’t give confidence though.
Has prompted me to but Hemke 2.0.
The step down from 2.5 UNIC is 2+. I still find it slightly hard and more akin to a 2.5. This is alto though, I got a 2.5 UNIC for tenor that I haven’t yet tried. I play a Legere US Cut 2.5 on tenor usually, and it works very well for the rock gigs.Hi Pete
What would you equate the reed strength 2.25 to your normal cane reeds,im going to London next week and was going to pick up one of these, I use a 2.5 in Lupifaro reeds which are made by Rigotti
and are equivalent their gold and wild reeds, I was going to get a 2.5 Unic but now might think of getting the 2.25.
Thanks in advance.
Yes, the jazz cut. Never come across the BSS Silver reeds..Which cut did you get Pete? I think the jazz cut is definitely duller than the BSS silver I use, but not massively so, and it’s more it lacks some punch than dull per se. And it could just boil down to the hardness; with all reeds harder equates to darker in my book. I was surprised when Marca suggested a harder strength (3+) than the equivalent cane reed I use, which was definitely too hard.
The main concern for me with these will be consistency. Given the process, really all it can be is making a cane reed last much longer. But not anything to improve consistency (and the poor consistency in cut experienced by both of us seems to confirm that). So the QA needs to improve and I think a solid no quibble return policy…. Marca produce consistent reeds for Alexander, so I have some hope.
I’ll do some recordings when I get back near the horn.
And where do you get yours; Headwind?They’re a fair bit brighter than the black, but not with the lack of depth I think reeds like Java and superials have. It’s a step further from the Rigotti gold jazz basically - just a bit more punch on attack.
