When you are young, say under 10 years old, progress from zero is relatively easy to measure. You typically would have an adult teacher who gives you progressively harder studies. That person will see how you are playing the exercises and pieces you're learning. As an adult learner from, say, 20 and up, beginner or intermediate, it's potentially less easy to see how you're doing. We all know there are up and down days, and mostly we're not truly satisfied with our progress. So I wondered,
How do you know you are moving up, forward, getting better at running this infernal machine called saxophone?
(In other words, moving towards the goal(s) you have set for yourself)
In a recent post about overtones, we talked about this in the sense that it is a specific goal in and of itself as well as a path to better altissimo mastery. In fact, I write this today, because in practicing overtones, you have a very precise measure of progress in that task. You either can or can not repeatedly hit a particular note. For example, yesterday, I know I am nearing a plateau in this work, because I get closer and closer to being able to confidently hit the 4th overtone on the first few notes. The exercise common to most everything I've read or watched involves playing the second (octave) overtone from low ("long-fingered") Bb up to F or further. I'd call that a good step, once you can do that. Then that part can be refined by further work on tone. That often involves matching the overtone with the same note's normal fingering or trying to slur between a low note and its first octave (or other) overtone.
Overtones are but one small part of learning to play the saxophone, so how do you measure progress in the rest of the "requirements", again to arrive at your goal, not to be the next Brecker.
I suppose you could measure the speed at which you can repeatedly play a chromatic scale from bottom to top and back? Does that act constitute a part of your goal? Few would answer yes.
You could measure the speed at which you can play usable scales, arpeggios, melodies accurately. But is speed alone your goal? Again... no.
It occurred to me on the way to the store that another "test" is how softly you can play notes, especially the lower ones. They are usually a challenge for new players, but eventually this improves. It's one of the too numerous things I'm doing these days. The improvement in that area is obvious as it happens, although it varies with reeds and mouthpieces (and saxes, I suppose).
Does outside approval help? Increased 'likes' on social? Sales? Downloads? I think they do help, to an extent, but only if you agree, you're progressing.
Aside from rigorous mathematical analysis such as highest tempo for a particular sequence of notes which we've found wanting, how do YOU think about this? Or do you think about it at all? And what about once you have reached your goals? Do you move the goalpost?
How do you know you are moving up, forward, getting better at running this infernal machine called saxophone?
(In other words, moving towards the goal(s) you have set for yourself)
In a recent post about overtones, we talked about this in the sense that it is a specific goal in and of itself as well as a path to better altissimo mastery. In fact, I write this today, because in practicing overtones, you have a very precise measure of progress in that task. You either can or can not repeatedly hit a particular note. For example, yesterday, I know I am nearing a plateau in this work, because I get closer and closer to being able to confidently hit the 4th overtone on the first few notes. The exercise common to most everything I've read or watched involves playing the second (octave) overtone from low ("long-fingered") Bb up to F or further. I'd call that a good step, once you can do that. Then that part can be refined by further work on tone. That often involves matching the overtone with the same note's normal fingering or trying to slur between a low note and its first octave (or other) overtone.
Overtones are but one small part of learning to play the saxophone, so how do you measure progress in the rest of the "requirements", again to arrive at your goal, not to be the next Brecker.
I suppose you could measure the speed at which you can repeatedly play a chromatic scale from bottom to top and back? Does that act constitute a part of your goal? Few would answer yes.
You could measure the speed at which you can play usable scales, arpeggios, melodies accurately. But is speed alone your goal? Again... no.
It occurred to me on the way to the store that another "test" is how softly you can play notes, especially the lower ones. They are usually a challenge for new players, but eventually this improves. It's one of the too numerous things I'm doing these days. The improvement in that area is obvious as it happens, although it varies with reeds and mouthpieces (and saxes, I suppose).
Does outside approval help? Increased 'likes' on social? Sales? Downloads? I think they do help, to an extent, but only if you agree, you're progressing.
Aside from rigorous mathematical analysis such as highest tempo for a particular sequence of notes which we've found wanting, how do YOU think about this? Or do you think about it at all? And what about once you have reached your goals? Do you move the goalpost?
Last edited by a moderator: