Thanks, Pete. This makes it much clearer. I agree that TTS does pretty good on generic searches ('Learning Saxophone', Saxophone tips', 'Saxophone leaks', Saxophone repairs', .... In all cases, TTS appeared in my top 5-15 search results. On Chrome, Edge and Firefox. The results on Chrome are skewed towards my search history. But I hardly ever use Edge and Firefox and have no search history with these browsers.There is no specific goal as in the amount of revenue is needed. Cafe does ok in long tail searches (searches that are less generic) TTS seems to do OK for more generic searches such as how to start out on saxophone.
I suppose though the goal right now is to survive the changing face of the internet with competition from social media, AI information, not to mention the dumbing down of information by the desire to get it from a buffoon of an influencer on YouTube (did I just say that?) as opposed to reading words and putting them into practise.
This doesn't surprise me. TTS has very rich, well-structured and focused content, plenty of relevant keywords in the natural text and the content is stable. Above all, my guess is that TTS gets plenty of visitor 'hits'.
In contrast, the content of the cafe (or any forum) is - by its nature - dynamic, relatively unstructured and any 'keywords' in post titles may not match (for example Chrome's) user's generic search criteria. So I can understand that (current) search engine 'WebCrawler's' are less able to score the value of the cafe's (dynamic) 'content'. TBH, I'm not sure whether limiting OT posts/responses might change this fundamental 'challenge' significantly.
I'm now 70 and my days of 'digital communication advice' are long over. But back in the day, we used to talk about 'repository content' (a website, for example TTS) and 'ephemeral content' (e.g. social media posts) which often referred back to the 'repository' (website). IHMO, the relationship between the cafe and TTS are reversed, TTS has good SEO and is IMHO perhaps the main digital 'referrer' to the cafe. Though word of mouth counts for a lot too!
Social media (Facebook, Instagram and especially YouTube) are absolutely stuffed with 'teasers' claiming to help sax players play better, at all levels. A few YouTube video series (including those by Dave Liebman and Harvey Pittel) seem to have no (commercial) interest other than the willingness to freely share their knowledge and experience. The cafe has definitely helped me distinguish between 'the wheat and the chaff'.
But in general, my gut feeling is that it makes little sense (either for TTS or for the cafe) to try and compete for attention in an already oversaturated social media 'market'. I fully agree that there are many 'buffoon influencers' on YouTube. Yes they get many 'hits' but IMHO it's also worth considering the audience to which these video's appeal to. My guess is that the 'teasers' appeal to (beginning) sax players who are attracted to the idea of a 'quick and easy fix' rather than going through a longer learning process. I may well be wrong.
So, to summarise, TTS has IMHO great SEO. If it was me, then I'd divert any SEO improvements towards TTS.
Then I'd edit the TTS header and home page to give much more prominence to the cafe (visibility,value, benefits, ease of click). Rather the trying to improve the SEO of the cafe directly.
Just a thought
Mike
