PiccoloPirate
Senior Member
- Messages
- 1,191
- Location
- South Florida
To hook up, with a Snook, is an electric reel in my furure?
But enharmonic spelling wasn’t really relevant at all in terms of the original question.I
I think the issue was about whether or not being enharmonically correct is important. There are two sides to that argument and I understand the value in each POV. But not really the same as semantics in my opinion. But I have been known to be wrong of course.
This may go off topic (again) but that sounds like a good topic for a new thread.One that uses the word, "abhor “ with respect, to writing out jazz solos,
If unicorns don't exist, how can you tell if one is drawn correctly? Convention!Unicorns do not exist, but are drawn correctly.
The problem is you corrected the wrong thing. G# had every place in the chord. Ab had no place. But the idea of the G# being a seventhThe G# in the opening post, was what I corrected.
A self confessed opinionated grump, started another page.
One that uses the word, "abhor", with respect, to writing out jazz solos, to allow beginners to get melodic. 🙀
Then they'd be trichorns. I believe Sarah Topps tried it.If unicorns don't exist, how can you tell if one is drawn correctly? Convention!
They might be black and have three horns for all we know.
😉

Maybe we need a new thread to discuss the advantages/importance (or not) of getting enharmonics correct.Now please stop arguing![]()
Can we also have one on the relevance of technical details that are completely irrelevant in the context of an initial question?Maybe we need a new thread to discuss the advantages/importance (or not) of getting enharmonics correct.
I've now started that discussion and moved relevant posts across as it is a whole topic by itself and this thread seems to have been resolved.Maybe we need a new thread to discuss the advantages/importance (or not) of getting enharmonics correct.
Of course you can, but it might work better in the context of a more general thread about posting policy and forum etiquette. I think it's definitely not a good idea to continue about it in this thread.Can we also have one on the relevance of technical details that are completely irrelevant in the context of an initial question?
I’m not looking for an argument...
...?Sorry you’re both talking crap...
Indeed not looking for an argument. Instead making an observation on two people talking rubbish, already after the original query was resolved....?
...
No wait
...
Let me guess
...
You work in the Diplomatic Corps?
