Wade Cornell
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 2,731
- Location
- New Zealand and Australia
I don't accept the argument that because (some) professional players use synthetic reeds, then everybody ought to. The requirements of professionals are different from amateurs, and their capabilities are different. Charlie Parker used to play on strength 5 reeds, but that doesn't mean that the rest of us should (or could!).
My teacher uses cane and plastic reeds. He is not dogmatic about what sort of reeds I use, and if he was, I would look for a different teacher. I don't have the same sort of saxophone or mouthpiece or ligature as him, so why should my reeds be the same? If I was having problems because of my choice of reeds then maybe he would suggest something, but my difficulties are due to the player, not the equipment.
I think we are saying the same thing, but get a sense that you think I'm being dogmatic. People should definitely choose whatever works for them. The proposition I was responding to was that cane, because it's natural/organic, is better. The person proposing this has NEVER even tried a synthetic. The proposition that a beginner could benefit from using a synthetic is hardly news. Everything is a challenge when learning. Eliminating variables (initially) should be an obvious benefit. If some think throwing variables in there will make them progress further faster they have no comparative basis by which to judge whether they achieved their goal. I see it like deciding you're going to be a supermodel when just learning to walk. Will it help you to learn to walk with books balanced on your head? Logic dictates learn to walk first.