Hello,
I have an issue with my Lebayle LRII 8* metal mouthpiece. It has a side to side concave table, by design to accomodate cane reed swelling. Don't seems to affect playability on cane/plasticover reeds as they are no leaking. But my new Ponzol Proreed synthetic reed has some leaking as it's 100% rigid and flat, only with my Lebayle ring ligature which applies pression on reed edges. With V16 Optimum lig, I've got no leaking. I've made a test with some saliva between reed and table, and while blowing the MPC with a finger in the MPC for etancheity I can very slightly hear bubbles, so it leaks. It's very slight however. When I put some cork grease between Proreed and table, no more leaking at all. And again it's only with synthetic reed/ring ligature combination.
Some illustrations here, with a first pic of my MPC with Proreed/ring lig with a light in my hand to show the leak:
With some cork grease between reed and table:
And here with V16 lig longitudinal rails plate and no cork grease:
I played a lot this V16 lig on my precedent MPCS which were a Yani metal and a V16 metal. But the Lebayle was selled with the ring lig, and liked it a lot as it gives a darker and focused tone with slightly wider low register. So I asked myself, is it clamping method and added material, or concave table whick make the difference? Pete Thomas is certainly right when he mentions perceived differences between ligs are more related to MPC table concavity than ligs specs in itself, even if he spokes more about lenght concavity than side to side one. With cork grease, the tone on Proreed seems to be a bit brighter with more eveness on the whole register, but really not by that much as with saliva too leak is really pretty minimal (air column in sax is a lot less resistant than saliva on a little leak like that). But again, it seems to be a very slight difference in reed/tone reactions, not even that consistent. I even tend to prefer the sound without cork grease, but it can be 100% in my head too : ))
So I ask myself... refacing or not? Cork grease seems to cure the issue with this ring lig on synthetic reed. And V16 lig has no issues at all. So refacing/flattening table despite offering a more permanent and reed friendly solution will scratches the Rhodium plating, and will asks for global refacing as table reduction changes tip opening. I can lose on this, if the character of this MPC is lost in the process, as I like it a lot like that.
What do you think about this?
Thanks.
I have an issue with my Lebayle LRII 8* metal mouthpiece. It has a side to side concave table, by design to accomodate cane reed swelling. Don't seems to affect playability on cane/plasticover reeds as they are no leaking. But my new Ponzol Proreed synthetic reed has some leaking as it's 100% rigid and flat, only with my Lebayle ring ligature which applies pression on reed edges. With V16 Optimum lig, I've got no leaking. I've made a test with some saliva between reed and table, and while blowing the MPC with a finger in the MPC for etancheity I can very slightly hear bubbles, so it leaks. It's very slight however. When I put some cork grease between Proreed and table, no more leaking at all. And again it's only with synthetic reed/ring ligature combination.
Some illustrations here, with a first pic of my MPC with Proreed/ring lig with a light in my hand to show the leak:
With some cork grease between reed and table:
And here with V16 lig longitudinal rails plate and no cork grease:
I played a lot this V16 lig on my precedent MPCS which were a Yani metal and a V16 metal. But the Lebayle was selled with the ring lig, and liked it a lot as it gives a darker and focused tone with slightly wider low register. So I asked myself, is it clamping method and added material, or concave table whick make the difference? Pete Thomas is certainly right when he mentions perceived differences between ligs are more related to MPC table concavity than ligs specs in itself, even if he spokes more about lenght concavity than side to side one. With cork grease, the tone on Proreed seems to be a bit brighter with more eveness on the whole register, but really not by that much as with saliva too leak is really pretty minimal (air column in sax is a lot less resistant than saliva on a little leak like that). But again, it seems to be a very slight difference in reed/tone reactions, not even that consistent. I even tend to prefer the sound without cork grease, but it can be 100% in my head too : ))
So I ask myself... refacing or not? Cork grease seems to cure the issue with this ring lig on synthetic reed. And V16 lig has no issues at all. So refacing/flattening table despite offering a more permanent and reed friendly solution will scratches the Rhodium plating, and will asks for global refacing as table reduction changes tip opening. I can lose on this, if the character of this MPC is lost in the process, as I like it a lot like that.
What do you think about this?
Thanks.
Last edited: