Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="JayeNM" data-source="post: 526056" data-attributes="member: 4504">I just wanna asterisk my prior comments on this topic, because I interestingly had a recent tire-kicker come to me and for some reason speak of the JP in the same sentence/category as the likes of Jupiter and Yamaha, claiming I had suggested so on forum comments (not sure whether they were reading here or the mean sax forum).So to reiterate: my opinion is....... IF one INSISTS on buying a NEW sax without REALLY having a market value budget for a reputed name-brand new model....the JP&#039;s aren&#039;t gonna be a bad choice given the choices one would have in ultra-budget-priced new horns. There&#039;s nothing glaringly bad about them, and they seem to hold regulation.There&#039;s a difference between THAT, and intimating that they are on par with a used Yama, Jupe, or Buffet.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="JayeNM, post: 526056, member: 4504"] [COLOR=rgb(41, 105, 176)]I just wanna asterisk my prior comments on this topic, because I interestingly had a recent tire-kicker come to me and for some reason speak of the JP in the same sentence/category as the likes of Jupiter and Yamaha, claiming I had suggested so on forum comments (not sure whether they were reading here or the mean sax forum). So to reiterate: my opinion is.... ... IF one INSISTS on buying a NEW sax without REALLY having a market value budget for a reputed name-brand new model....the JP's aren't gonna be a bad choice given the choices one would have in ultra-budget-priced new horns. There's nothing glaringly bad about them, and they seem to hold regulation. There's a difference between THAT, and intimating that they are on par with a used Yama, Jupe, or Buffet.[/COLOR] [/QUOTE]

Verification