Tutorials
Shop
Supporting special needs music education
About
Forum guide
Rules
Support the Café fundraising
Mailing List
Pete Thomas
Forums
Forum list
Start a discussion
🎷 Saxophone Discussion
📖 Articles
Tutorials
More info
Saxophone Info
Beginners
Beginners impro
Impro & Theory
Mouthpieces
Saxophone Effects
Improve your Tone
Patterns & Exercises
PT consultations
Shop
NEW
Unfiltered
Latest activity
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
Note
By:
Forum list
Start a discussion
🎷 Saxophone Discussion
📖 Articles
Menu
Log in
Register
How to install the app
How to install the app on iOS
NB: For Safari start at step 2
(Firefox only) Tap on the hamburger menu at bottom right
Tap on the share icon
(bottom of page)
Scroll down and tap on
Add to Home Screen:
Note:
This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Forums
🎷 Main Discussion 🎷
Saxophones: gear, playing, repair, impro
Who believes in Link Chops?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Mike T" data-source="post: 521351" data-attributes="member: 5470"><p>I currently have a 1932 Transitional tenor (a <em>real</em> "Chu"), a 1937 10M and a 1967 Selmer Mk.VI. The Conns are big and dark (the Tranny being the darker of the two), while the Mk VI is much gentler - with a tone more like a Yamaha YTS 21. I was never a fan of Turrentine's; for a big tenor tone I'd rather listen to Gene Ammons or Ike Quebec. </p><p></p><p>As for Illinois and Arnett being "completely in the same ball park," that misapprehension derives from their shared history, following each other in the same band. Illinois was a control freak - he never played anything by chance - nothing wild about him - everything was planned out and executed flawlessly with his amazing technique and his middle-of-the-road tone. Arnett on the other hand, although he too had an amazing technique, played from the heart rather than from the head. His playing was very melodramatic at times, and he took his chances, which occasionally didn't pay off. The odd bum note is the price you pay for playing with your heart rather than with your head - but, oh ! what excitement he could generate when he let rip with that huge tone !</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Mike T, post: 521351, member: 5470"] I currently have a 1932 Transitional tenor (a [I]real[/I] "Chu"), a 1937 10M and a 1967 Selmer Mk.VI. The Conns are big and dark (the Tranny being the darker of the two), while the Mk VI is much gentler - with a tone more like a Yamaha YTS 21. I was never a fan of Turrentine's; for a big tenor tone I'd rather listen to Gene Ammons or Ike Quebec. As for Illinois and Arnett being "completely in the same ball park," that misapprehension derives from their shared history, following each other in the same band. Illinois was a control freak - he never played anything by chance - nothing wild about him - everything was planned out and executed flawlessly with his amazing technique and his middle-of-the-road tone. Arnett on the other hand, although he too had an amazing technique, played from the heart rather than from the head. His playing was very melodramatic at times, and he took his chances, which occasionally didn't pay off. The odd bum note is the price you pay for playing with your heart rather than with your head - but, oh ! what excitement he could generate when he let rip with that huge tone ! [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
🎷 Main Discussion 🎷
Saxophones: gear, playing, repair, impro
Who believes in Link Chops?
Back
Top
Bottom