Saxophone reviews Thomann Low Jazz Baritone Sax

Messages
66
Location
Horley, Surrey UK
Intro
So, after reading Steven Howard’s review I finally bought a Thomann Low Jazz Baritone Sax.

Background
I owned an old silver Buescher True Tone Bari Sax in the 80s and loved its sound and light weight, the set-up and key layout. Regrettably, I sold that as it was very old and didn’t have the high E and F etc. and, played various Low A Baritones including the Yamaha YBS-32 and my Sakkusu Deluxe, which has served me well. Missing that distinctive Low Bb sound, I bought the Thomann fairly recently. I’ve never been happy with the Low A Baritones.

General
I’m not going to add to anything that Steven Howard covered in his review but, I’m really pleased with it. The horn is heavy at 5.3 kg but lighter than the other Low A’s I’ve played – my Sakkusu is 5.5 kg. It sounds good, is indeed well built and the intonation is well sorted. Typical of Bari saxes it’s a little cumbersome under the fingers and the action needs tweaking. Bari saxes will always feel as if you’re holding a melon! … well to me anyway as I have short stubby fingers that struggle to play low Bb.

Cost and Competition
Although the price has crept up over the last 18 months it is still excellent value for money, for a Low Bb Bari. I wanted the un-lacquered one but that is more expensive … I don’t get that! There’s little competition out there with only the P Mauriat PMB-302 being made and a few old Buescher True Tones and 400s, Conn Cross Bar and some Martins about. With the Mauriat being £5,500 and the Thomann at £3,200 ish, it remains an absolute bargain … for now.

Negatives
The only negatives I found were that the lyre socket is inaccessible in it’s position being paired with the tenon joint screw and that is a design fail. This matters to some. You can get to it but it takes some effort and, standard lyres will not work as the socket is behind rather than being on the front of the horn. It only has one neck strap ring so finding an alternate balance point might be tricky but, that’s a minor issue.

Objective
I’m not into stripping and testing tone hole levels etc., that’s for the techs, so fall back on Steven Howard’s views. I’ll just tell how it feels and sounds. It definitely feels solid and well built. Soundswise the intonation is good to my ears and after checking with a tuner. The horn is bright in the mid to upper tones, especially through my Dukoff Silverite D9 (Super Power Chamber) mouthpiece but, it retains the rich lower tones.

Sound
Resonance is mildly lacking and I put that down to the dense, harder or thicker brass but it projects reasonably well. I’m not saying it’s dull sounding, just that it’s quite tonally neutral compared to say, Yamaha or the vintage horns. A favoured mouthpiece pairing might well be the metal Otto Link Super Tone Master (STM) or a Berg Larsen metal piece with a big baffle.

I don’t have a Link bari piece, just a tenor 8* STM. Other pieces I have, include the stock one, a Yamaha 5C, the Brilhart designed Rico Graftonite 5B and Metalite M7, all of which struggle for volume on the bari. You could stick with ebonite or plastic mouthpieces and go the classical route with hard reeds … if you can handle them.

The problem with bari's is all that extra bell and the open tone holes means that less sound gets to microphones pointed at the bell. So in theory the Low Bb models should sound better and produce more volume; but it's difficult getting enough air through that big bore.

Mouthpieces
On that note I would always recommend you choose a wider tip opening on bari – you’ll thank me - and opt for a high baffle for brightness and more volume, especially if you’re a soloist. For example, if you play a 7 tip then go for a 9 on bari as they lack volume and, those long reeds play much softer. If you’re a marching bander or section player you can always rein the sound in but you can’t push a mouthpiece beyond its design limits.

Handling
Losing that extra bell length of the Low A models means that it swings around much easier and I like to use the neck strap despite owing a harness and it comes with a well padded strap. The key layout is okay; I tend to occasionally catch the side palm D, the front Auxilery (altissimo) and the side Bb keys, but I don’t play so much bari now after spending several years previously playing bari in a rock and roll band … that’s my short fingers again.

Appearance
The gold lacquer is a very nice colour by the way. Overall, it really is a nice horn and I have given it a work-out at some open mics. The case is the typical hard plastic one with four catches and wheels that the South-East Asian bari’s all seem to come in and they do the job.

Overall
Would I recommend this bari? Most certainly and I understand that others have given it a big thumbs up. It’s playing well out of the box. It doesn’t have the charm of the Buescher though, but what do you expect. If you need more information ask.
 
Last edited:
Thank you for sharing your thoughts and experience. A friend, blues and rock sax player, bought a Thomann Low Jazz Baritone and I tried/blew it for some yours. I liked it. I tried it with a metal mouthpiece in the style of a Berg Larsen Scoop Bill Break (low step baffle, .120 tip, small roll over baffle, facing something between SMS and M) and a self prepared LaVoz baritone reed.

I often play Blues,R&B and R&R songs in concert A and E so I don't miss the low A so often. My "The Martin Baritone" don't have alt/trill F# but that key is on the Thomann Low Jazz Baritone which is good.

Another good thing with the low Bb baris is that the end of the bell and flair use to be wider/bigger, compared to a low A, so you can get a SM 58 into the bell!! I don't like clip-on microphones on bari saxes and the good microphones are too expensive. But many bari player are using good clip-on microphones and they sounds fine.

Enjoy your bari.
 
Last edited:
Lurking around for all the Low Jazz info for the past couple days trying to learn as much as I can about them. I’ve got a Low A Dolnet but I miss the Bb Bari’s. So just sold the other Dolnet Low A and convinced to buy a Low Jazz used but hardly at a great price. I’m hoping the two PPT Oxynite Mouthpieces will work, one a POWER the other Signature, fantastic under rated pieces. They both have survived the cut amongst 10 other mouthpieces lately . Nowhere on the Internet have I been able to find a sound sample of this baritone but maybe after I get mine I’ll put one up.
 

Attachments

  • IMG_8154.webp
    IMG_8154.webp
    23.5 KB · : 15
Lurking around for all the Low Jazz info for the past couple days trying to learn as much as I can about them. ... ... Nowhere on the Internet have I been able to find a sound sample of this baritone but maybe after I get mine I’ll put one up.
So, what bari is in the picture, what are you going to 'get' and, what bari do you want a sound sample of???
 
Last edited:
Amati made Low Bb baris parallel with Low A baris. I like Amati tenors and baris. Use to be less money as well.

jimlaabsmusicstore.com/store/amati-model-abs-63-eb-baritone-saxophone/
 
I was looking at this B flat Thomas Low Jazz and after investigating further, it might be a P Mauriat. Anyway, the guy turns out to be a fraud scammer trying to sell on Facebook so I ditch that for now sticking with the DOLNETT.
Yes, the Thomann Low Jazz Baritone is made in Taiwan and is remarkably similar to the P Mauriat PMB 302 (to quote Stephen Howard). The Low Jazz is a very good horn, especially for the price.
 
Last edited:
Thanks for posting. The low Bb baris seems to be popular again ..... .
I've always been a Low Bb Bari fan since owning a Buescher True Tone back in the 1980s. That model was so light and had a beautiful tone. I really regret selling it for a Low A. I looked up Yanagisawa Low Bb bari's and 'Sax On The Web' seem to say that they were only sold in the Japanese market as an 880B but I haven't got the time to look it up properly. I think the arguments about tone are a bit moot but a Low Bb Bari is definitely easier to swing about, albeit there's not a lot in the weight difference of modern bari's ... I've weighed the Yamaha YBS-32 and, Thomann Low Jazz and the Sakkusu Low A I have.
 
I've always been a Low Bb Bari fan since owning a Buescher True Tone back in the 1980s. That model was so light and had a beautiful tone. I really regret selling it for a Low A. I looked up Yanagisawa Low Bb bari's and 'Sax On The Web' seem to say that they were only sold in the Japanese market as an 880B but I haven't got the time to look it up properly. I think the arguments about tone are a bit moot but a Low Bb Bari is definitely easier to swing about, albeit there's not a lot in the weight difference of modern bari's ... I've weighed the Yamaha YBS-32 and, Thomann Low Jazz and the Sakkusu Low A I have.
Some Low A bairs got the low A by making an extension on the bell. Weltklang, Conn 11M/13M ... they didn't get the low fat bari sound. But the low A bari was practical because the could write music in concert C.
 
I found the 11m to have a great low sound
The cylindercal part (low B) that was added to the 12M bell was not ideal. I'm not an expert but I heard a difference like alternative fingerings. On Weltklangs it was low B/H and Bb, that waas added as a cylindercal part. Sure, they had a big and strong low voice but it was more like basson.
 

Similar threads... or are they? Maybe not but they could be worth reading anyway 😀

Popular Discussions on the Café

Forum statistics

Topics
27,011
Messages
495,234
Members
6,975
Latest member
Gold
Back
Top Bottom