Mouthpieces Quick question about a Berg Larsen SS Tenor mouthpiece.

I recently bought a used Berg Larsen Tenor mouthpiece and noticed that the small inscription (London etc.) under the name "Berg Larsen" on the front was completely missing. Is this a thing or did someone just randomly choose to sand this part off? It almost looks like it, but I'm not sure. Anyways, I'm curious if anyone has seen something similar before.

IMG_2393.jpg
 
I think Berg Larsen saxophone mouthpieces are made in Belgium these days?

The old ones used to be engraved "London, England" and "Reg.Design, 851427/8" (on the one I have in front of me) below "BergLarsen".
 
Could it just have worn off with use? It looks like traces remain, and the tail of the 'g' is also worn.

It might. But it's a weird place to touch that often. Then again, the impressive "canyon" in the bite plate also speaks for extended use. Which is understandable, since I also really click with this mouthpiece.
 
Yes, I think so, but I also think they didn't change anything about the engraving. At least the images of new ones in online stores still have it.
I bought a new one for some years ago and the new on was several "g" lighter than the old ones. I think type of chamber matters when it comes to the weight. SS = surgical steel or stainless steels. But your BL SS looks like an old one. The info on the shank is also important. 100/2 M, 120/0 SMS ...... and that info is stamped, not engraved.
 
Could it just have worn off with use? It looks like traces remain, and the tail of the 'g' is also worn.
I could never imagine the engraving just wearing off. The stainless steel is very hard and the engraving is quite deep. My guess is that it's just slipped through without being done.
 
I bought a new one for some years ago and the new on was several "g" lighter than the old ones. I think type of chamber matters when it comes to the weight. SS = surgical steel or stainless steels. But your BL SS looks like an old one. The info on the shank is also important. 100/2 M, 120/0 SMS ...... and that info is stamped, not engraved.
Indeed, I also had a new one some time ago, which was quite "flimsy" compared to this, which is a 110/2/SMS with a scoop bill and a straight drop at the end of the baffle. Don't know if it's that old, but I really like the way it responds. It has a really "contoured" sound.
 
Looking closely, the machine marks (1) which go around the bottom of the shank look to me like it has been turned and the marking removed. Also the indent (2) confirms this.

It also explains why the loop of the g is fainter.

Berg Larsen Stainless Steel tenor mouthpiece
 
Looking closely, the machine marks (1) which go around the bottom of the shank look to me like it has been turned and the marking removed. Also the indent (2) confirms this.

It also explains why the loop of the g is fainter.
That was my initial though. The question is probably impossible to answer, but why would someone do that?

Then again, maybe it's understandable that with a mouthpiece you like, you're eager to find out about all of its idiosyncracies. 🙂
 

Members' Blogs

Trending content

Forum statistics

Topics
29,694
Messages
515,203
Members
8,756
Latest member
Theotensop
Back
Top Bottom