Re: Swap Gold Lawton Mouthpiece for Silver
I wasn't having a swipe at all, but as Ads says above, there is a strong difference of opinion on whether plating affects tone.
If there is a difference, working from first principles I'd expect it to be small (but subtle differences in musical sound can be important, after all, can they not?) The plating is only a few microns, so the extra thickness is negligible, so I would not expect a difference in tone due to difference in wall thickness. While bells, for example, sound different when made from different materials, the sound coming out of a saxophone isn't produced by very rapid vibrations caused by striking it sharply. So my gut feeling is that whatever it is plated with - gold, silver, or whatever, or whether the instrument is made of brass, some sort of bronze, plastic or concrete won't affect the tone. But it is only a gut feeling...
In fact I believe experiments with a concrete clarinet were held to prove this. I can't query this one way or the other, not having the maths or acoustic theory nor having seen the data...
Lacquer versus no lacquer would seem to me even less likely to make a difference to tone. The thickness is less than plating.
While my gut feeling inclines me to doubt any difference, some very accomplished professionals indeed seem not to agree. Does not our own aldevis prefer an unlacquered Sequoia or two?
Brass bands are a strong tradition here in Cornwall. Some of the bands Liskeard, for example) are silver bands - I think there was a fashion for silver bands at one time. My ex-wife-to-be (very soon, as it happens) is of the opinion that silver plating is detrimental to the sound. She is an accomplished player - with a beautiful tone - and did her music degree on tenor horn with Howard Snell at the Royal Northern, so she is no mug. I have heard the same from other leading banders. On the other hand... I have heard silver band players - respected and accomplished players, too - say that silver instruments sound sweeter....
So, really, I'm pretty agnostic on this... I'll leave it to the experts to discuss.
Differences in sound between one manufacturer or model and another - or even individual examples of the same model and year - is a different matter.
But, even if some or even all of the above is still open to debate, aesthetics count, too. Saxophones are, to me, fascinating examples of craftsmanship, and it gives pleasure to own beautiful objects. Even if functionality is no different, having something with an appearance or feel that pleases you, or being made by a craftsman you admire wish to support, or something which has a history - or, if you prefer, is the latest model - if it is what you want, then go for it.
I prefer old Land Rovers, old wooden boats and younger women. My preferences in those categories are largely aesthetic - but they matter to me...