oldcorollas
Member
- 49
Hi BR,
I was wondering why my mouthpiece was always trying to break my teeth, so I did some measuring of internet pictures and compared my Nikkan to other saxes, new and old.
I measured the position of the strap ring, as well as the thumbrest positions, and plotted on the graph below (as these are measured form pictures, they are rather approximate, any better measurements would be appreciated!)
You can see "good ergo" horns are toward the left, with the ring about 50-52% up the body (measured from bow to tenon), whilst Conn 10M and 30M, and Buffet SDA have rather poor locations and strange thumbrest positions compared to most other saxes.
Interestingly, the Mark VI has relatively high positions for both thumbrests and the strap ring.. I wonder if they are weighted differently, or if people get the strap rings moved?
Measurements for my Nikkan
bottom thumb: 28.3% up body
ring: 56.6% up body
top thumb: 73% up body
ring position between thumbrests = 64%
My Nikkan has almost exactly the same locations as the 10M, and 10M people very often get the ring moved ring down a couple of inches (to save their teeth!)
So then I calculated what would happen to the ratios of the neck strap ring up the body (for balance), and between thumbrests, when moved a certain distance down, and got this:
I had some Copper tube lying around (10mm diameter, 2mm wall thickness), so i made a little device to test new hole positions. The strap ring has a small disc of Perspex (acrylic? PMMA) in it, and the lower end has a bit of cork to bold it off the body. It is secured at the lower end with a humble cable tie.
This allows me to move the following distances.
18mm (54.1%)
31mm (52.3%)
41mm (50.9%)
50mm (49.7%)
I was wondering why my mouthpiece was always trying to break my teeth, so I did some measuring of internet pictures and compared my Nikkan to other saxes, new and old.
I measured the position of the strap ring, as well as the thumbrest positions, and plotted on the graph below (as these are measured form pictures, they are rather approximate, any better measurements would be appreciated!)

You can see "good ergo" horns are toward the left, with the ring about 50-52% up the body (measured from bow to tenon), whilst Conn 10M and 30M, and Buffet SDA have rather poor locations and strange thumbrest positions compared to most other saxes.
Interestingly, the Mark VI has relatively high positions for both thumbrests and the strap ring.. I wonder if they are weighted differently, or if people get the strap rings moved?

Measurements for my Nikkan
bottom thumb: 28.3% up body
ring: 56.6% up body
top thumb: 73% up body
ring position between thumbrests = 64%
My Nikkan has almost exactly the same locations as the 10M, and 10M people very often get the ring moved ring down a couple of inches (to save their teeth!)
So then I calculated what would happen to the ratios of the neck strap ring up the body (for balance), and between thumbrests, when moved a certain distance down, and got this:

I had some Copper tube lying around (10mm diameter, 2mm wall thickness), so i made a little device to test new hole positions. The strap ring has a small disc of Perspex (acrylic? PMMA) in it, and the lower end has a bit of cork to bold it off the body. It is secured at the lower end with a humble cable tie.

This allows me to move the following distances.
18mm (54.1%)
31mm (52.3%)
41mm (50.9%)
50mm (49.7%)
Last edited by a moderator: