- 8,175
Some of you may recall my Grassi 2000 restoration: Saxophones - Should I save her? Grassi 2000 Professional Tenor - Restoration?
Well, I found this lurking in the small ads and having had a few Buffets before immediately recognised it as a Superdynaction, but without its model inscription. Instead, "Sole distributors John E Dallas & Sons Ltd London".


A little research found this info on a similar one: buffet SDA alto
I could tell from the photos it needed a repad and would likely be unplayable (it isn't due to a couple of springs missing, let alone the ripped pads) but I was curious and it was 15 minutes away from an appointment last night.
Before I went I found a useful video by Matt Stohrer on SDA pads and screw-in resonators:
View: https://youtu.be/-HybQc3LTQY

I checked the serial number, 5249, and it appears to be a 1959 model (the SDA was born 1957), so it's also my birth year horn!
I also read the earlier ones with nickel plated keys had a better sound but this may be more to do with key heights (as Matt explains in his video) than build differences. @Stephen Howard did a review of older and newer SDAs and found little difference in sound, here: Buffet Super Dynaction (SDA) alto saxophone review
The Buffet has a mouthpiece firmly stuck to its neck, a Berg Larsen 85/2 SMS
See more photos in the link at the bottom...
I'm wondering what this might be worth as it could help toward the cost of overhauling the sax. Any ideas anyone? Seems to have its original log and cap.
So, being a Buffet fan and having enjoyed my later 1970's SDA years ago I shall have to restore this one to its full glory. Paul Carrington did my SA80II overhaul (sticky pads before) and he's quite happy to keep the original screw-in resos so as to maintain originality. There are no dents so far as I can see, and the worn nickel on some touches I shall leave as it adds to the horn's back story of being played and enjoyed over at least some of the last 60 years.
I'm going to strip and clean it so as to save on Paul's labour costs and will update in a few months when it's back. My 60th is 17th December so it would be good to have a playable 60 year old SDA as a present.
Will I keep it thereafter? My l ast SDA lost out to my SA80II, and as Steve says in his review the tendency is for the SDA to enjoy a softer blow. That was my experience compared to the Selmer but I do wonder whether Matt's comment on this and increased key heights for extra volume (along with the additional "domed" space the screw-ins allow) might make a difference. I wonder if Steve experimented with key heights when doing his review?
More photos here: Buffet Barn Find
Well, I found this lurking in the small ads and having had a few Buffets before immediately recognised it as a Superdynaction, but without its model inscription. Instead, "Sole distributors John E Dallas & Sons Ltd London".


A little research found this info on a similar one: buffet SDA alto
I could tell from the photos it needed a repad and would likely be unplayable (it isn't due to a couple of springs missing, let alone the ripped pads) but I was curious and it was 15 minutes away from an appointment last night.
Before I went I found a useful video by Matt Stohrer on SDA pads and screw-in resonators:

I checked the serial number, 5249, and it appears to be a 1959 model (the SDA was born 1957), so it's also my birth year horn!
I also read the earlier ones with nickel plated keys had a better sound but this may be more to do with key heights (as Matt explains in his video) than build differences. @Stephen Howard did a review of older and newer SDAs and found little difference in sound, here: Buffet Super Dynaction (SDA) alto saxophone review
The Buffet has a mouthpiece firmly stuck to its neck, a Berg Larsen 85/2 SMS

See more photos in the link at the bottom...
I'm wondering what this might be worth as it could help toward the cost of overhauling the sax. Any ideas anyone? Seems to have its original log and cap.
So, being a Buffet fan and having enjoyed my later 1970's SDA years ago I shall have to restore this one to its full glory. Paul Carrington did my SA80II overhaul (sticky pads before) and he's quite happy to keep the original screw-in resos so as to maintain originality. There are no dents so far as I can see, and the worn nickel on some touches I shall leave as it adds to the horn's back story of being played and enjoyed over at least some of the last 60 years.
I'm going to strip and clean it so as to save on Paul's labour costs and will update in a few months when it's back. My 60th is 17th December so it would be good to have a playable 60 year old SDA as a present.
Will I keep it thereafter? My l ast SDA lost out to my SA80II, and as Steve says in his review the tendency is for the SDA to enjoy a softer blow. That was my experience compared to the Selmer but I do wonder whether Matt's comment on this and increased key heights for extra volume (along with the additional "domed" space the screw-ins allow) might make a difference. I wonder if Steve experimented with key heights when doing his review?
More photos here: Buffet Barn Find