Tutorials
Resource icon

Reviews A Possibly Slanted Review of the New Slant Link

Phil

Member
Messages
503
Location
France
Phil submitted a new resource:

A Possibly Slanted Review of the New Slant Link - A Possibly Slanted Review of the New Slant Link

I will put my possibility of being biased for personal reasons right up front so that hopefully the reader is aware and we can move on. I make mouthpieces and I do a lot of work on Links. That being the case I had to see this piece and review it.


Visual Inspection:
The baffle is much nicer than in the past. They took the weird lake at the bottom of the baffle out which is a good move.

The rails were uneven. I dont put too much stock in this as the thickness of each rail in reference to...
Read more about this resource...
 
Last edited by a moderator:

davhudson

Member
Messages
175
Location
Milton Keynes, United Kingdom
you can still buy a regular modern Link, spend the additional money to have it reworked by a number of mpc guys that do great work on Links, and end up with a superior product in terms of precision and tone.
Thanks for the review. I have not seen a lot a flaming here, I think we are more into considered discussion.;}

I would like to pick up on something you said...
As a beginner could you tell me a little about what sort of work can be done on a mpc - what is to be gained from this and what sort of money we are talking about?
 
OP
Phil

Phil

Member
Messages
503
Location
France
It all really depends on the mouthpiece. Since we are talking about links a lot can be done to make them play and sound much better. I will never claim to make slants. I think its a lot of market hype to suck money out of nonsuspecting players.

First tables can be flattened so that there is a better reed seal. This improves response. A good facing curve that is parallel and proper in radius can be applied (some use non-radial facings but most dont). This too improves response, efficiency and the core tone of a piece.
Next, in modern links there is a ton of material in the throat of the mouthpiece that makes it sould like a sock has been shoved in it. Chamber work can be done in different areas to get a freer blowing piece with more resonance.

Finally, the baffle and facing curve have to be tonally ballanced and the baffle done right so it doesnt blow stuffy.

This is not all that can be done to a piece by far but its some of the basics.

Links take a lot of work to sound good but its worth it. In terms of money...I charge 75-80 bucks to do the job if someone supplies the blank. I also stock Links and sell them completed.

Not every mouthpiece needs refacing but I find that most benefit. Of course I dont have to pay for it since I do it myself.

I dont want to give the impression that I thought the new Vintage Link is a bad mouthpiece. It just doesnt meet the full expectation of what a link can be. What I consider to be production shortcuts have made a very solid mouthpiece but as a result it still lack the depth and core of traditional links...specifically in that the chamber volume is now considerably smaller.
 

Saxby

Member
Messages
90
Location
Warsaw, Poland.
Thanks Phil for the information regarding the New Links and mpce re-facing in general.
Also glad you have become a member of this site and are happy and willing to share your knowledge.
 

kevgermany

ex Landrover Nut
Subscriber
Messages
21,982
Location
Just north of Munich
Phil, thanks, really interesting. So how does a beginner tell and old link from a new one? & what should one look for? Won't be changing 'til I've been playing for a t least a year, but I keep my eyes on ebay, and if something comes up at a good price, I'd like to put it away for a first sax anniversary present.
 

Saxlicker

Well-Known Member
Messages
1,822
Location
Breakfast room since '06
Final Thoughs:
However, (yes, there is a big however) given the price of the mouthpiece (and I expect the price to increase) you can still buy a regular modern Link, spend the additional money to have it reworked by a number of mpc guys that do great work on Links, and end up with a superior product in terms of precision and tone.
Hi Phil,
From the above,
I'm getting that,
The chamber is larger on the modern tone edges than on the new slant?
The rubber is the same on the modern tone edge and the new slant?
Hence in the hands of a knowledgeable MPC guy he can create closer to the original slant than babbit have done, largely because of the chamber?

As a side, what about comparision to an early babbit? I don't know the difference between early babbit and original slant models.
I have read the SOTW pages and listened to samples too. I preferred the EB to the new slant for complexity of sound but I don't know whether the sound difference is because of the findings you mention.
Thanks
Saxlicker.
 
OP
Phil

Phil

Member
Messages
503
Location
France
I dont have an early babbitt to compare to but the EB, as far as I know, startes with a standard Link. I do very much belive that the difference in complexity comes from part of what I said earlier.
The other critical factor is that the EB, my pieces, and those comming from individuals are genearlly play tested and very minor adjustments made to bring out the best in a mouthpiece. You would be suprised at how a single pass or two of the file across the baffle alters the piece in terms of response and tone. A half milimeter in facing length can be the difference between a ballanced tonal range and one that isnt quite nailed. You can make a piece by the numbers but hedging those numbers with actual experience can make a world of difference.
 

Saxlicker

Well-Known Member
Messages
1,822
Location
Breakfast room since '06
My sister who lives in the USA is currently visiting the family in the UK.
Very kindly, she has bought me a a new vintage HR otto link mouthpiece from tenor madness.
I have had minimal time on this piece and here are my unbiased findings/comparisons of how it plays.

The piece is an 8 which is a bit smaller than all the high baffled pieces I have always favoured.
My previous 10 years playing has typically been on Guardala's and over the last 18 months or so an RPC .115B.
The RPC gave me more depth and versatility over the studio (hand made) and the WWBW MBII that had been my main pieces.
Before this, I never thought anything would convert me to rubber after some disappointing trials with pieces produced in the late 80's...I was completely turned off.

So thanks to the RPC, when the link was presented to me I was more excited about it than I would have been in years gone by.

I warmed up on the RPC and changed to the link after 10 mins or so. Initially with the same ligature and reed.
First impressions were that it was small in sound and too close a tip opening for me.
I persevered with it for a similar time to the RPC and swapped back.
EEK!
Is this the same RPC I took off? all of a sudden although a free blowing piece still, the sound was so bright, going on shrill.
I played it and tamed it back to a sound I was getting before.
I've never felt the need for this before and it was clear that for me to get the best from either piece, I had adjusted my technique over the duration of playing without a concious effort to make it work.
Once the RPC was tamed, it was OK but something dark, thick and complex that was in the link, was not available in the RPC.
I switched to the link for longer periods and enjoyed it more and more. Getting many colours from it that were also present in the RPC yet retaining those extra colours unique to the link. I started to dabble with reeds and ligatures buut not to excess.
You can see where this is heading right?
Even the volume, edge and brilliance of the RPC were starting to become available on request from the link but I couldn't get the link character from the RPC.
I was now used to the tip opening and it is at this point all one way traffic!!!
 
Last edited by a moderator:
OP
Phil

Phil

Member
Messages
503
Location
France
Nope your not going to get a link sound from an RPC. Its a totally different baffle construction. On my tenor pieces I use the same blank as Ron but they have a linkish tone because the baffle is a link style baffle most of the time.

I dont mean to knock the new Link so hard...I just think you can get more of that good stuff from a larger chambered Link that has had the gym sock taken out of it by a good mpc guy.
 
support Tutorials CDs PPT mouthpieces
Top Bottom