1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.
  2. CafeSaxophone Social & Workshop
    Autumn event - Sponsored by Atradius
    SEE HERE FOR MORE INFO
    Dismiss Notice
Dismiss Notice
FORUM MAINTENANCE THIS MORNING at about 11:30 GMT
The forum will be closed hopefully only about 15 minutess

Please accept our apologies for any inconvenience

Berg Larsen too sharp; how to fix?

Discussion in 'Saxophone (technical)' started by Squawky, May 29, 2011.

  1. Squawky

    Squawky Member

    Messages:
    38
    Likes Received:
    6
    Location:
    United States
    I purchased a Stainless Steel Berg Larsen 120/1/M tenor mouthpiece (same as listed in my sig) back in December of 2010 as my first jazz mouthpiece. Before the Berg, I was playing on my school's Selmer S-80 C*. I play the Berg on my Super 20, and I love the sound, but the problem is, it plays around 40 cents sharp when about in the middle of my cork. When I back it off to get it in tune, it refuses to stay on my neck. I've had it recorked with a very large cork and have used plumber's tape before to hold the piece on, but it still wobbles. Is there something I can do to get this thing to play in tune? Or should I just look for another mouthpiece that will give me a similar sound but will stay in tune and more importantly, stay on the neck?
     
  2. Loading...

    Possibly Similar Threads Forum Date
    Berg Larsen alto sax Sold Mar 27, 2015
    Berg larsen Sold Mar 7, 2014
    Berg Larsen soprano saxophones Saxophones & Accessories Dec 4, 2013
    Berg Larsen sizing Saxophones & Accessories Nov 3, 2013

  3. thomsax

    thomsax Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    2,262
    Likes Received:
    419
    Berg Larsen ss tenor mouthpiece and King Super 20 is a "classic" setup used by lots of players. Big sound. Maybe you should have a new thicker neckcork? Easy for a tech to help you with.

    Thomas
     
  4. Nick Wyver

    Nick Wyver noisy

    Messages:
    3,837
    Likes Received:
    1,164
    Location:
    Minster On Sea
    Switching from a Selmer C* to a 120 Berg is a heck of a jump. Sounds more like you want to work on your embouchure. Has anyone else played it?
     
  5. Saxo

    Saxo New Member

    Messages:
    2
    Likes Received:
    0
    A Selmer C* is .071, Berg Larsen is .120. As Nick said, that is a heck of a jump -even for a player with years of experience.
     
  6. Squawky

    Squawky Member

    Messages:
    38
    Likes Received:
    6
    Location:
    United States
    I purchased the mouthpiece used on ebay, so yes, someone else has played it, and there weren't any complaints that I saw about the intonation of the mouthpiece. Any recommendations on ways I can strengthen my embouchure?
     
  7. Pyrografix

    Pyrografix Senile Member

    Messages:
    1,011
    Likes Received:
    245
    Location:
    Sunny Aberdeenshire
    I think the question about someone else 'playing it' was referring to someone else playing your sax and the new mouthpiece together - maybe a teacher or someone with experience of that type of m/piece could try it, to eliminate any doubts about the mouthpiece itself.

    Keep practicing!
     
  8. Nick Wyver

    Nick Wyver noisy

    Messages:
    3,837
    Likes Received:
    1,164
    Location:
    Minster On Sea
    Yup. That's what I meant. If you know an experienced sax player (that's sax player - not a clarinetist who thinks a sax is a sort of inferior clarinet) then get him to play your set-up and see what the intonation's like,

    "Strengthening" your embouchure is possibly the wrong way of thinking about it. It sounds like you need to loosen up.
     
  9. thomsax

    thomsax Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    2,262
    Likes Received:
    419
    I also tried Berg Larsen ss with wide opening (115/0 SMS and 120/0 SMS) on King Super 20 tenor. They were too hard for me to handle. I also tried a Dukoff LD 10 (0.130) with the same result. If you want to give your mouthpiece a chance I think you must play a lot and do embouchure excersises every day and several hours each day. You must keep in mind that a setup like yours was used by players like King Curtis, Clarence Clemons, Red Prysock (but they were on harder reeds!!!) … . So it’s not easy for hobby players, like myself, to get used to such setups.

    Try to trade your open Larsen for a medium (0.90-0.95) or medium-open (0.100-.0.105) one. Your reed is also fine on Berg Larsens. A LaVoz M reeds are softer than Rico, Rico Royal 2,5 but harder than Vandoren 2. You can try a softer reed on your mouthpiece as well and see how it turns out. I think the M facing is easier to control compared to the SMS facing. The “1” baffle is a quite high (closer to the reed) compared to the low “3” baffle. I would say your mouthpice is a great Rock or R&B mouthpiece. Larsens baffles are 0-3 with 0 brightest and 3 darkest.

    I have owned three King Super 20 tenors and they were hard for me to get along with. IMO, a demanding sax. Thats way I switched to Martins. Better for me to play on. The King Super 20 is a very nice and delicate sax. I regret I sold my first King Super 20 from the early 50’s. A milestone when it comes to saxes!

    Good luck with your sax and mouthpice. King Super 20 and Berg Larsen metal mouthpieces sounds good in my ears!


    Thomas
     
  10. Squawky

    Squawky Member

    Messages:
    38
    Likes Received:
    6
    Location:
    United States
    Alright, thanks! I'll have my sax teacher take a look at the mouthpiece and try out my whole setup to see whether it's just me or if there's something up with the mouthpiece. As for a different Berg, I'm thinking I might also do a lower baffle on the next one, perhaps a 2. I'll look around for a decent 105/2/M in stainless. Or should I try bronze? I also ordered a box of Rico Jazz Select 2H reeds yesterday so I'll see how those react with the mouthpiece.
     
  11. Clivey

    Clivey Senior Member

    Messages:
    687
    Likes Received:
    528
    Location:
    Fife UK
    I can`t get a toot out of my"100/2 SMS" these days as I stick to a 5 YAM.

    It`s all embouchure stuff. No Fast way I`m afraid.
     
  12. Saxo

    Saxo New Member

    Messages:
    2
    Likes Received:
    0
    Exactly ! A .120 is extreme. John Coltrane used a .090, Stan Getz a .095 and most of the best tenors never exceeded .105.
     
  13. Jules

    Jules Formerly known as "nachoman"

    Messages:
    3,713
    Likes Received:
    476
    Location:
    brighton by the sea
    agree with the first bit of your statement but I'm not convinced by that bit- ernie watts, brecker etc.. plas johnson's epic 150 thou berg etc (but, as they say- don't try this at home)
     
  14. thomsax

    thomsax Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    2,262
    Likes Received:
    419
    I have a BL ss (blue box) tenor mpc 95/2 SMS in good condition. Send a PM if you want to trade?

    Thomas
     
  15. compound

    compound Member

    Messages:
    456
    Likes Received:
    67
    Location:
    Manchester.
    Hi Squawky,
    Is there any sign inside the piece that it has been reworked in the past,? worth checking.
    Rob.
     
  16. Paul Inglis

    Paul Inglis Senior Member

    Messages:
    1,054
    Likes Received:
    114
    Location:
    Isle of Man
    I don’t agree! Many great Tenor Saxophonists play / played bigger than .105” such as:

    • Pete Christlieb| Metal Berg Larsen 130/0
    • Arnett Cobb | Otto-Link #9 (0.120”)
    • Ronnie Cuber | Otto-Link 8* (0.115”)
    • Frank Foster | Lawton 10*B
    • Gary Foster | Lawton 10*B
    • Stan Getz | Otto-Link 8* HR (0.115”)
    • Johnny Griffin | Otto-Link 0.150”
    • Jimmy Giuffre | Berg Larson 130/0
    • Scott Hamilton | Otto-Link #12 (0.150”)
    • Willis "Gator Tail" Jackson | Otto-Link 12* (0.155”)
    • Plas Johnson | Berg Larson 160/2
    • Bob Malach | Otto-Link 8* (0.115”)
    • James Moody | RPC 150M
    • Houston Person | Lawton #10
    • Lenny Pickett | Berg Larsen 130/0
    • Joshua Redman | Otto-Link 9* (0.125”)
    • Sonny Rollins| Berg Larsen 130/2
    • Wayne Shorter | Otto-Link #10 HR (0.130”)
    • Ernie Watts | Otto-Link #13 (0.160”)
    • Ben Webster | Otto-Link #9 (0.120”)
    • Plus many, many more …
    I play an 8* (0.115”) which I find a little too small and having a custom 0.120” made up which plays a little bigger than the Otto-Link so it’ll be more like a 0.125” (9*).

    There are plenty of great players at the other extreme who play tiny tip openings such as Don Byas with his Otto-Link Florida Super Tone Master 3* (0.065”).

    Could you play Coltrane’s set-up? He played his Custom Otto-Link 5* (0.080”) with Rico #4 Reeds!!!

    Everyone has different mouth sizes, shapes, tongues, jaws, lungs, etc … which mean’s finding a tip opening that suits you and a chamber, baffle, etc … that gives you that sound you want!

    Doesn’t the nice Mr Thomas play a PPT 9* (0.125”)!

    EDIT: BTW Stan Getz, actually played an Otto-Link 8* HR (0.115”) not a 0.095" ;}
     
    Last edited by a moderator: May 30, 2011
  17. kevgermany

    kevgermany ex Landrover Nut Cafe Moderator

    Messages:
    14,987
    Likes Received:
    2,672
    Location:
    Just north of Munich
    I think there are two points here:

    1 - the jump is huge and will take some managing. OP has already decided to do something about it.
    2 - Each 'great' player played what he wanted to play. And many changed at different times in their careers. You don't need a big opening to be a good player, and neither do you need a small opening. Even though the modern tendancy is towads wider tips/softer reeds, it's not an absolute. And no point in arguing...
     
  18. Paul Inglis

    Paul Inglis Senior Member

    Messages:
    1,054
    Likes Received:
    114
    Location:
    Isle of Man
    That's what I was trying to say! In too many words :)))

    :shocked: Spoil sport :)))
     
  19. Squawky

    Squawky Member

    Messages:
    38
    Likes Received:
    6
    Location:
    United States
    Rob,

    I don't think it has been reworked. Everything looks pretty normal. Eventually I can upload some pictures of the piece when I get home.
     
  20. jonf

    jonf Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    2,661
    Likes Received:
    569
    Location:
    Betelgeuse
    I'm not a great player, and never will be, so this probably means nothing, but I play a 120 mouthpiece, a modified Otto Link 10. I just find it suits me. I've always found things like Yamaha 4c and 5c, and Selmer C* to be like trying to blow through a pinhole, and I started playing on a 105 mouthpiece. I don't find a 120 to be in any way extreme.

    None of this is any evidence of me being a tough macho guy (I'm not) as I play using either a RJS 2S or 2M reed. So, big mouthpiece, soft reed. Works for me.
     
  21. Squawky

    Squawky Member

    Messages:
    38
    Likes Received:
    6
    Location:
    United States
    I do understand what you're saying. I love the 120 tip opening and I don't think it's extreme either. It's a great feel but my only issue is intonation. I'm hoping that finding a slightly smaller tip opening will allow me to control it better and thus achieve bearable intonation. Also, what do you think of those RJS reeds? I haven't tried them yet.